Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20236774›Full record

SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2010

The more you drink, the harder you fall: a systematic review and meta-analysis of how acute alcohol consumption and injury or collision risk increase together.

B Taylor, H M Irving, F Kanteres, R Room, G Borges, C Cherpitel, T Greenfield, J Rehm

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03867812 (Effect of Consumption of Different Foods on the Pharmacokinetics of a Small Dose of Ethanol), which is not on this map. Cited by 197 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
101.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03867812 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Consumption of Different Foods on the Pharmacokinetics of a Small Dose of Ethanol: A Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial in Healthy Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorZeno Functional Foods, LLCRan2019 to 2019Enrolled21ConditionsAlcohol Use, UnspecifiedArmsSOBAR, Control food, Full meal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 491 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Alcohol consumption for simulated driving performance: A systematic review.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 6 countries.

B TaylorCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario M5S2S1, Canada. bennyjtaylor@gmail.com
H M Irving
F Kanteres
R Room
G Borges
C Cherpitel
T Greenfield
J Rehm
Addiction Switzerland · CHCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LUI, CAMILLIA K. · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
Cross-National Analysis of Alcohol & InjuryR01AA013750 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI CHERPITEL, CHERYL J · 2002 to 2018
$4.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol consumption causes injury in a dose-response manner. The most common mode of sustaining an alcohol-attributable injury is from a single occasion of acute alcohol consumption, but much of the injury literature employs usual consumption habits to assess risk instead. An analysis of the acute dose-response relationship between alcohol and injury is warranted to generate single occasion- and dose-specific relative risks. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted to fill this gap. Linear and best-fit first-order model were used to model the data. Usual tests of heterogeneity and publication bias were run. Separate meta-analyses were run for motor vehicle and non-motor vehicle injuries, as well as case-control and case-crossover studies. The risk of injury increases non-linearly with increasing alcohol consumption. For motor vehicle accidents, the odds ratio increases by 1.24 (95% CI: 1.18-1.31) per 10-g in pure alcohol increase to 52.0 (95% CI: 34.50-78.28) at 120 g. For non-motor vehicle injury, the OR increases by 1.30 (95% CI: 1.26-1.34) to an OR of 24.2 at 140 g (95% CI: 16.2-36.2). Case-crossover studies of non-MVA injury result in overall higher risks than case-control studies and the per-drink increase in odds of injury was highest for intentional injury, at 1.38 (95% CI: 1.22-1.55). Efforts to reduce drinking both on an individual level and a population level are important. No level of consumption is safe when driving and less than 2 drinks per occasion should be encouraged to reduce the risk of injury.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationCase-Control StudiesCross-Over StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansOdds RatioPublication BiasResearch DesignRiskWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID20236774
PMCPMC2887748
OpenAlexW2117662245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.