ReviewCritical care (London, England)2010
Pro/con debate: Should antimicrobial stewardship programs be adopted universally in the intensive care unit?
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic prescribing patterns and knowledge of antibiotic resistance amongst the doctors working at public health facilities of a state in northern India: A cross sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Attitudes and Perceptions amongst Critical Care Physicians towards Handshake Antimicrobial Stewardship Rounds.Cureus · 2019Article
- Antibiotic stewardship programmes in intensive care units: Why, how, and where are they leading us.World journal of critical care medicine · 2015Review
- Antibiotic stewardship in Germany: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of 355 intensive care units.Infection · 2014Article
- Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2014Review
- Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study.Intensive care medicine · 2012Article
- Antimicrobial stewardship programs: mandatory for all ICUs.Critical care (London, England) · 2012Article
- Appraising contemporary strategies to combat multidrug resistant gram-negative bacterial infections--proceedings and data from the Gram-Negative Resistance Summit.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011Review
- Strategies of initiation and streamlining of antibiotic therapy in 41 French intensive care units.Critical care (London, England) · 2011Article
- Year in review 2010: Critical Care--Infection.Critical care (London, England) · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
You are director of a large multi-disciplinary ICU. You have recently read that hospital-wide antibiotic stewardship programs have the potential to improve the quality and safety of care, and to reduce the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms and overall costs. You are considering starting one of these programs in your ICU, but are concerned about the associated infrastructure costs. You are debating whether it is worth bringing the concept forward to your hospital's administration to consider investing in.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.