Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20236486›Full record

ReviewJournal of biology2010

Making progress in genetic kin recognition among vertebrates.

Jane L Hurst, Robert J Beynon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Host-parasite coevolution and the stability of genetic kin recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. The Evanescent Bouquet of Individual Bear Fingerprint.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Odour dialects among wild mammals.Scientific reports · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Chemical fingerprints encode mother-offspring similarity, colony membership, relatedness, and genetic quality in fur seals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jane L HurstMammalian Behaviour and Evolution Group, School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston CH647TE, UK. jane.hurst@liv.ac.uk
Robert J Beynon

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBC603897Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S19816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study in BMC Evolutionary Biology has shown that genetically similar individual ring-tailed lemurs are also more similar in their scent composition, suggesting a possible mechanism of kin recognition. Theoretical and experimental studies reveal challenges ahead in achieving a true systems-level understanding of this process and its outcomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCuesFemaleLemurMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMaleMiceOdorantsPheromonesPolymorphism, GeneticSexual Behavior, AnimalPheromones

Identifiers

PMID20236486
PMCPMC2871517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.