ArticleJAMA2010
Patient-reported long-term outcomes after conventional and high-dose combined proton and photon radiation for early prostate cancer.
Article in JAMA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I-II Trial of Hypofractionated Conformal Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer
Loma Linda University Medical Center Department of Radiation Medicine Patient Registry
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Phase 3 Randomized Prospective Trial of Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2017Trial
- Long-term quality of life outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2014Trial
- Urinary functional outcomes and toxicity five years after proton therapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: results of two prospective trials.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2013Trial
- Patient Reported Outcomes and Treatment-Associated Complications as a Consideration in Selecting Localized Prostate Cancer Management.Research and reports in urology · 2025Review
- Impact of Rectal Spacer on Toxicity Reduction in Men Treated With Proton Versus Photon Therapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Systematic review of methodology used in clinical studies evaluating the benefits of proton beam therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2019Article
- Improved long-term patient-reported health and well-being outcomes of early-stage breast cancer treated with partial breast proton therapy.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- Quality of life among men with low-risk prostate cancer during the first year following diagnosis: the PREPARE prospective cohort study.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Article
- Dose-Escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Quality-of-Life Comparison of Two Prospective Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Article
- Proton therapy for early stage prostate cancer: is there a case?OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Review
- Big Data Analytics for Prostate Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Review
- Current state of the art, multimodality research and future visions for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer: consensus results from "Challenges and Chances in Prostate Cancer Research Meeting 2013".Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2014Article
- Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particle therapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014Review
- Late toxicity and quality of life after definitive treatment of prostate cancer: redefining optimal rectal sparing constraints for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.Cancer medicine · 2014Article
- Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2013Article
- [Translational uroradio-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2013Article
- Proton beam and prostate cancer: An evolving debate.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2013Review
- Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextIncreased radiation doses improve prostate cancer control but also increase toxicity to adjacent normal tissue. Proton radiation may attenuate adverse effects.
objectiveTo determine long-term, patient-reported, dose-related toxicity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We performed a post hoc cross-sectional survey of surviving participants in the Proton Radiation Oncology Group (PROG) 9509--a randomized trial comparing 70.2 Gy vs 79.2 Gy of combined photon and proton radiation for 393 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (stage T1b-T2b, prostate-specific antigen <15 ng/mL, and no radiographic evidence of metastasis). The estimated 10-year biochemical progression rate for patients receiving standard dose was 32% (95% confidence interval, 26%-39%) compared with 17% (95% confidence interval, 11%-23%) for patients receiving high dose (P < .001). We surveyed 280 of the surviving 337 patients (83%) from April 2007 to September 2008.
main outcome measuresProstate Cancer Symptom Indices, a validated measure of urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction and irritation, bowel problems, and sexual dysfunction, and related quality-of-life instruments.
resultsAt a median of 9.4 years after treatment (range, 7.4-12.1 years), participants' demographic and clinical characteristics were similar. Patient-reported outcomes were reported as mean (SD) scale score for standard dose vs high dose: urinary obstruction/irritation (23.3 [13.7] vs 24.6 [14.0]; P = .36), urinary incontinence (10.6 [17.7] vs 9.7 [15.8]; P = .99), bowel problems (7.7 [7.8] vs 7.9 [9.1]; P = .70), sexual dysfunction (68.2 [34.6] vs 65.9 [34.7]; P = .65), and most other outcomes were also similar, although patients receiving standard dose whose cancers had more often progressed expressed less confidence that their cancers were under control (mean [SD] scale score for standard dose, 76.0 [25.4] vs high dose, 86.2 [17.9]; P < .001). Many patients characterized their urinary and bowel function as normal despite reporting symptoms that, for other prostate cancer patients before and early after cancer treatment, caused substantial distress.
conclusionAmong men with clinically localized prostate cancer, treatment with higher-dose radiation compared with standard dose was not associated with an increase in patient-reported prostate cancer symptoms after a median of 9.4 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.