Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20233822›Full record

ArticleJAMA2010

Patient-reported long-term outcomes after conventional and high-dose combined proton and photon radiation for early prostate cancer.

James A Talcott, Carl Rossi, William U Shipley, Jack A Clark, Jerry D Slater, Andrzej Niemierko, Anthony L Zietman

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00831623 nacompletednot on this map

Phase I-II Trial of Hypofractionated Conformal Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2009 to 2019Enrolled167ConditionsProstate CancerArmsProton Radiation, Proton
NCT02436941 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Loma Linda University Medical Center Department of Radiation Medicine Patient Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2003 to 2050Enrolled75,000ConditionsCancerArmsProton or Photon
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particle therapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Translational uroradio-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2013
    Article
  19. Proton beam and prostate cancer: An evolving debate.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2013
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James A TalcottCenter for Outcomes Research, MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. jtalcott@partners.org
Carl Rossi
William U Shipley
Jack A Clark
Jerry D Slater
Andrzej Niemierko
Anthony L Zietman
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIncreased radiation doses improve prostate cancer control but also increase toxicity to adjacent normal tissue. Proton radiation may attenuate adverse effects.

objectiveTo determine long-term, patient-reported, dose-related toxicity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We performed a post hoc cross-sectional survey of surviving participants in the Proton Radiation Oncology Group (PROG) 9509--a randomized trial comparing 70.2 Gy vs 79.2 Gy of combined photon and proton radiation for 393 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (stage T1b-T2b, prostate-specific antigen <15 ng/mL, and no radiographic evidence of metastasis). The estimated 10-year biochemical progression rate for patients receiving standard dose was 32% (95% confidence interval, 26%-39%) compared with 17% (95% confidence interval, 11%-23%) for patients receiving high dose (P < .001). We surveyed 280 of the surviving 337 patients (83%) from April 2007 to September 2008.

main outcome measuresProstate Cancer Symptom Indices, a validated measure of urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction and irritation, bowel problems, and sexual dysfunction, and related quality-of-life instruments.

resultsAt a median of 9.4 years after treatment (range, 7.4-12.1 years), participants' demographic and clinical characteristics were similar. Patient-reported outcomes were reported as mean (SD) scale score for standard dose vs high dose: urinary obstruction/irritation (23.3 [13.7] vs 24.6 [14.0]; P = .36), urinary incontinence (10.6 [17.7] vs 9.7 [15.8]; P = .99), bowel problems (7.7 [7.8] vs 7.9 [9.1]; P = .70), sexual dysfunction (68.2 [34.6] vs 65.9 [34.7]; P = .65), and most other outcomes were also similar, although patients receiving standard dose whose cancers had more often progressed expressed less confidence that their cancers were under control (mean [SD] scale score for standard dose, 76.0 [25.4] vs high dose, 86.2 [17.9]; P < .001). Many patients characterized their urinary and bowel function as normal despite reporting symptoms that, for other prostate cancer patients before and early after cancer treatment, caused substantial distress.

conclusionAmong men with clinically localized prostate cancer, treatment with higher-dose radiation compared with standard dose was not associated with an increase in patient-reported prostate cancer symptoms after a median of 9.4 years.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsProtonsProton TherapyRadiation InjuriesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeProtons

Identifiers

PMID20233822
OpenAlexW2014198657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.