Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20232145›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2010

Recurrent acute pancreatitis: clinical profile and an approach to diagnosis.

K G Sajith, Ashok Chacko, Amit Kumar Dutta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Etiology of Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis in Vietnamese Children: an Initial Report.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2020
    Article
  7. Differences between the outcome of recurrent acute pancreatitis and acute pancreatitis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Article
  8. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic pancreatitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: When should we do it?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Definitions of pediatric pancreatitis and survey of present clinical practices.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recurrent and relapsing pancreatitis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K G SajithDepartment of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632 004, India.
Ashok Chacko
Amit Kumar Dutta
Christian Medical College · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThough recurrent acute pancreatitis is often seen in clinical practice, there are few comprehensive articles on this entity. The aim of this study therefore was to assess the etiological and clinical profile as well as diagnostic yield of non-invasive and invasive tests in this group of patients.

methodsAll patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis seen from 2002 to 2007 were included in the study, retrospectively. Clinical information, investigation, and treatment data were collected for all patients by a standardized review of medical charts. Diagnostic tests were grouped into level one (non-invasive) and level two (invasive) tests and their yield was assessed. Comparison was made between the group with known etiology and idiopathic group to look for significant differences.

resultsA total of 188 patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis were seen during the study period. Common etiological factors were biliary disease (37%), pancreas divisum (8.5%) and alcohol (6.4%). Multiple etiologies were seen in 7% of cases, and no cause was found in 32.4%. The diagnostic yield of level-one investigation (non-invasive) was 29.3%. Level-two tests (invasive) identified presumptive etiologies in 38.3% of cases. Complications developed in 12.2% and there was no mortality. Clinical features and complications were similar in the idiopathic group and those with known etiology.

conclusionsEtiological diagnosis was obtained in 67.6% of patients after comprehensive diagnostic work up. Diagnosis in the majority of patients could only be reached after invasive tests (bile crystal analysis, EUS, ERCP). Early diagnosis and etiology-based therapy is the key to optimum patient outcome.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAlcohol-Related DisordersAlgorithmsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceDyslipidemiasEndosonographyFemaleGallstonesHumansHypercalcemiaLiver Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID20232145
OpenAlexW2002167428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.