ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2010
[Non-adjustable sling for treatment of male stress urinary incontinence].
Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though the artificial sphincter is still the treatment of choice in the surgical therapy of male stress urinary incontinence, recent developments have introduced numerous minimally invasive treatment options with acceptable clinical results. The male slings have been included into the EAU guidelines for treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. A distinct choice of patients and treatment options will lead to the highest chance of success. Besides the adjustable compressive slings, the non-adjustable and non-compressive AdVance Sling offers a possible option for a functional approach to treatmentratio. A critical assessment of all these methods remains essential and prospective randomized trials are still missing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.