Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20231479›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Principles of conduction and hydrophobic gating in K+ channels.

Morten Ø Jensen, David W Borhani, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Paul Maragakis, Vishwanath Jogini, Michael P Eastwood, Ron O Dror, David E Shaw

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 324 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Deciphering CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Effective polarization in potassium channel simulations: Ion conductance, occupancy, voltage response, and selectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanism of external K+ sensitivity of KCNQ1 channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Morten Ø JensenDE Shaw Research, New York, NY 10036, USA.
David W Borhani
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Paul Maragakis
Vishwanath Jogini
Michael P Eastwood
Ron O Dror
David E Shaw
D. E. Shaw Research · USColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the first atomic-resolution observations of permeation and gating in a K(+) channel, based on molecular dynamics simulations of the Kv1.2 pore domain. Analysis of hundreds of simulated permeation events revealed a detailed conduction mechanism, resembling the Hodgkin-Keynes "knock-on" model, in which translocation of two selectivity filter-bound ions is driven by a third ion; formation of this knock-on intermediate is rate determining. In addition, at reverse or zero voltages, we observed pore closure by a novel "hydrophobic gating" mechanism: A dewetting transition of the hydrophobic pore cavity-fastest when K(+) was not bound in selectivity filter sites nearest the cavity-caused the open, conducting pore to collapse into a closed, nonconducting conformation. Such pore closure corroborates the idea that voltage sensors can act to prevent pore collapse into the intrinsically more stable, closed conformation, and it further suggests that molecular-scale dewetting facilitates a specific biological function: K(+) channel gating. Existing experimental data support our hypothesis that hydrophobic gating may be a fundamental principle underlying the gating of voltage-sensitive K(+) channels. We suggest that hydrophobic gating explains, in part, why diverse ion channels conserve hydrophobic pore cavities, and we speculate that modulation of cavity hydration could enable structural determination of both open and closed channels.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaElectric ConductivityHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsIn Vitro TechniquesKineticsKv1.2 Potassium ChannelModels, BiologicalModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiaryRatsKv1.2 Potassium Channel

Identifiers

PMID20231479
PMCPMC2851896
OpenAlexW1963480981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.