Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20231440›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Lack of p21 expression links cell cycle control and appendage regeneration in mice.

Khamilia Bedelbaeva, Andrew Snyder, Dmitri Gourevitch, Lise Clark, Xiang-Ming Zhang, John Leferovich, James M Cheverud, Paul Lieberman, Ellen Heber-Katz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. p21 Knockdown as a Therapeutic Strategy for Focal Cartilage Injury Repair.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prx1NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Khamilia BedelbaevaCellular and Molecular Oncogenesis and Gene Expression, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Andrew Snyder
Dmitri Gourevitch
Lise Clark
Xiang-Ming Zhang
John Leferovich
James M Cheverud
Paul Lieberman
Ellen Heber-Katz
The Wistar Institute · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
Mapping Murine Regeneation GenesR01GM073226 · NIGMS · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI HEBER-KATZ, ELLEN S. · 2006 to 2009
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS P30 CA10815NIGMS NIH HHS GM073226NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals capable of regenerating multiple tissue types, organs, and appendages after injury are common yet sporadic and include some sponge, hydra, planarian, and salamander (i.e., newt and axolotl) species, but notably such regenerative capacity is rare in mammals. The adult MRL mouse strain is a rare exception to the rule that mammals do not regenerate appendage tissue. Certain commonalities, such as blastema formation and basement membrane breakdown at the wound site, suggest that MRL mice may share other features with classical regenerators. As reported here, MRL fibroblast-like cells have a distinct cell-cycle (G2/M accumulation) phenotype and a heightened basal and wound site DNA damage/repair response that is also common to classical regenerators and mammalian embryonic stem cells. Additionally, a neutral and alkaline comet assay displayed a persistent level of intrinsic DNA damage in cells derived from the MRL mouse. Similar to mouse ES cells, the p53-target p21 was not expressed in MRL ear fibroblasts. Because the p53/p21 axis plays a central role in the DNA damage response and cell cycle control, we directly tested the hypothesis that p21 down-regulation could functionally induce a regenerative response in an appendage of an otherwise nonregenerating mouse strain. Using the ear hole closure phenotype, a genetically mapped and reliable quantitative indicator of regeneration in the MRL mouse, we show that the unrelated Cdkn1a(tmi/Tyj)/J p21(-/-) mouse (unlike the B6129SF2/J WT control) closes ear holes similar to MRL mice, providing a firm link between cell cycle checkpoint control and tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell CycleCell DivisionCell ProliferationCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNA DamageDNA RepairExtremitiesFemaleG2 PhaseIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, CongenicMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutCdkn1a protein, mouseCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Rad51 protein, mouseRad51 RecombinaseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20231440
PMCPMC2851923
OpenAlexW2120729899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.