Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20231399›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Effect of ceftaroline on normal human intestinal microflora.

Georgios Panagiotidis, Tobias Bäckström, Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg, Alena Jandourek, Andrej Weintraub, Carl Erik Nord

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Review of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections and Infective Endocarditis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of cephalosporins in the era of Clostridium difficile infection.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2017
    Review
  12. Gut Microbiota-brain Axis.Chinese medical journal · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Ceftaroline fosamil: a brief clinical review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2013
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgios PanagiotidisDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias Bäckström
Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg
Alena Jandourek
Andrej Weintraub
Carl Erik Nord
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ceftaroline is a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin being developed for the treatment of serious bacterial infections, including those caused by aerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of administration of ceftaroline on the intestinal flora of healthy subjects. Twelve healthy subjects (6 males and 6 females), 20 to 41 years of age, received ceftaroline (600 mg) by intravenous infusion every 12 h (q12h) for 7 days. Plasma and feces were collected for determination of ceftaroline concentration and analysis of fecal flora. Fecal specimens were cultured on nonselective and selective media. Different colony types were counted, isolated in pure culture, and identified to the genus level. All new strains of colonizing bacteria were tested for susceptibility to ceftaroline. The concentrations of ceftaroline in plasma were as follows: on day 2, 17.5 to 34.8 mg/liter; on day 5, 19.7 to 33.2 mg/liter; and on day 7, 18.0 to 29.8 mg/liter. No ceftaroline concentrations were found on day -1, 9, 14, or 21. No measurable concentrations in feces were found on day -1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 14, or 21. There was a minor impact on the numbers of Escherichia coli strains, while the numbers of enterococci and Candida albicans strains were not affected. There were moderate decreases in the numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli during the first 7 days, while the numbers of clostridia increased during the same period. No impact on the numbers of Bacteroides bacteria was noticed. No new colonizing aerobic or anaerobic bacteria resistant to ceftaroline (MIC >or= 4 mg/liter) were found. Ceftaroline had no significant ecological impact on the human intestinal microflora.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteria, AerobicBacteria, AnaerobicCeftarolineCephalosporinsFecesFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntestinesMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReference ValuesYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftarolineCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID20231399
PMCPMC2863678
OpenAlexW2139793230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.