Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20231389›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Ethambutol optimal clinical dose and susceptibility breakpoint identification by use of a novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of disseminated intracellular Mycobacterium avium.

Devyani Deshpande, Shashikant Srivastava, Claudia Meek, Richard Leff, Tawanda Gumbo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of tetracyclines for nontuberculous mycobacteria: focus on rapidly growing mycobacteria.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Novel regimens for treatment ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Rifamycin-, macrolide-, and ethambutol-free combinations to treatThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tigecycline pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber system ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Comparison of Rifamycins for Efficacy AgainstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Devyani DeshpandeDivision of Infectious Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9113, USA.
Shashikant Srivastava
Claudia Meek
Richard Leff
Tawanda Gumbo
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethambutol, together with a macrolide, is the backbone for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium disease. However, at the standard dose of 15 mg/kg of body weight/day, ethambutol efficacy is limited. In addition, susceptibility breakpoints have consistently failed to predict clinical outcome. We performed dose-effect studies with extracellular M. avium as well as with bacilli within human macrophages. The maximal kill rate (E(max)) for ethambutol against extracellular bacilli was 5.54 log(10) CFU/ml, compared to 0.67 log(10) CFU/ml for intracellular M. avium, after 7 days of exposure. Thus, extracellular assays demonstrated high efficacy. We created a hollow-fiber system model of intracellular M. avium and performed microbial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies using pharmacokinetics similar to those of ethambutol for humans. The E(max) in the systems was 0.79 log(10) CFU/ml with 7 days of daily therapy, so the kill rates approximated those encountered in patients treated with ethambutol monotherapy. Ratio of peak concentration to MIC (C(max)/MIC) was linked to microbial kill rate. The C(max)/MIC ratio needed to achieve the 90% effective concentration (EC(90)) in serum was 1.23, with a calculated intramacrophage C(max)/MIC ratio of 13. In 10,000 patient Monte Carlo simulations, doses of 15, 50, and 75 mg/kg achieved the EC(90) in 35.50%, 76.81%, and 86.12% of patients, respectively. Therefore, ethambutol doses of >or=50 mg/kg twice a week would be predicted to be better than current doses of 15 mg/kg for treatment of disseminated M. avium disease. New susceptibility breakpoints and critical concentrations of 1 to 2 mg/liter were identified for the determination of ethambutol-resistant M. avium in Middlebrook broth. Given that the modal MIC of clinical isolates is around 2 mg/liter, most isolates should be considered ethambutol resistant.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, MicrobialEthambutolHumansMacrophagesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodMycobacterium aviumMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionAntitubercular AgentsEthambutol

Identifiers

PMID20231389
PMCPMC2863641
OpenAlexW2113560142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.