Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20231242›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2010

Development of the Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives.

Stevens S Smith, Megan E Piper, Daniel M Bolt, Michael C Fiore, David W Wetter, Paul M Cinciripini, Timothy B Baker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. An Automated, Online Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of a Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention for Smoking Cessation (Quit Sense).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Trial
  8. Augmented reality for extinction of cue-provoked urges to smoke: Proof of concept.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Trial
  9. Predicting Non-Adherence With Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes Among Adults With Serious Mental Illness Who Smoke.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  10. History and Correlates of Smoking Cessation Behaviors Among Individuals With Current or Past Major Depressive Disorder Enrolled in a Smoking Cessation Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Five-Day Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure Among Adult Smokers After Completely Switching From Combustible Cigarettes to a Nicotine-Salt Pod System.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  15. Impact of E-cigarette Sampling on Cigarette Dependence and Reinforcement Value.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  16. Anxiety Sensitivity and Distress Tolerance in Smokers: Relations With Tobacco Dependence, Withdrawal, and Quitting Success†.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  17. The Impact of Gradual and Immediate Nicotine Reduction on Subjective Cigarette Ratings.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Pleasant olfactory cues can reduce cigarette craving.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2019
    Trial
  20. A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Optimized Smoking Treatment Delivered in Primary Care.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018
    Trial

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stevens S SmithCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Madison, WI 53711, USA. sss@ctri.medicine.wisc.edu
Megan E Piper
Daniel M Bolt
Michael C Fiore
David W Wetter
Paul M Cinciripini
Timothy B Baker

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (UW-Madison)KL2RR025012 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$11.1M
RELAPSE: LINKING SCIENCE AND PRACTICEP50CA084724 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI FIORE, MICHAEL C · 1999 to 2003
$8.9M
Tobacco Dependence: Treatment and OutcomesP50DA019706 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON-POWELL, GLORIA · 2004 to 2008
$8.6M
Treatment of Nicotine Dependence Among HypertensivesR01CA094826 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WETTER, DAVID W · 2001 to 2005
$2.3M
Training in Translational Tobacco ScienceK05CA139871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BAKER, TIMOTHY B · 2008 to 2012
$850k
Longitudinal Psychometric Investigation of the WISDM Tobacco Dependence MeasureR03CA126406 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SMITH, STEVENS S · 2006 to 2006
$77k
NCI NIH HHS 01CA94826NCI NIH HHS 1R03CA126406-01NCI NIH HHS 5P50CA084724-05NCI NIH HHS K05 CA139871NCI NIH HHS P50 CA084724NCI NIH HHS R01 CA094826NCI NIH HHS R01CA94826S1NCI NIH HHS R03 CA126406NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR025012-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025012NIDA NIH HHS 5P50DA019706-09NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA019706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 68-item Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68) is a theoretically derived measure of tobacco dependence consisting of 13 subscales measuring a variety of smoking motives. The WISDM-68 subscales have demonstrated good psychometric characteristics and have the potential to elucidate diverse nicotine dependence factors and mechanisms. The present research aimed to shorten the WISDM to reduce assessment burden while maintaining or enhancing its psychometric properties.

methodsData from three independent samples (one longitudinal observational study and two randomized clinical trials) were used to select subscales and reduced sets of items in order to develop and test a brief version of the WISDM-68. The full-item and reduced-item versions of the WISDM were then compared in terms of reliability, validity, and model fit (via confirmatory factor analysis) in the three independent samples.

resultsThirty-one items were dropped from the WISDM, the Behavioral Choice-Melioration subscale was dropped, and the Negative and Positive Reinforcement subscales were consolidated. This resulted in a new WISDM short form (Brief WISDM) comprising 37 items that load onto 11 subscales. The psychometric properties of the reduced-item WISDM subscales were found to be comparable with the full-item subscales in terms of internal consistency, long-term stability, concurrent validity, predictive validity, and model fit. DISCUSSION: These analyses provide good evidence that the 37-item Brief WISDM can be used in place of the original 68-item WISDM if researchers desire to reduce participant assessment burden.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropionData CollectionFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Use DisorderAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropionNicotine

Identifiers

PMID20231242
PMCPMC2861888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.