Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2023110›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics1991

Analysis of arterial-venous blood concentration difference of drugs based on recirculatory theory with fast inverse Laplace transform (FILT).

Y Yano, K Yamaoka, H Yasui, T Nakagawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y YanoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Japan.
K Yamaoka
H Yasui
T Nakagawa
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An arterial and venous blood (or plasma) concentration difference of drugs across the lung of rats was evaluated based on the recirculatory concept. The recirculatory system is given by the combination of the transfer functions for the pulmonary and the systemic circulations and is described by a Laplace-transformed equation, i.e., an image equation. For the manipulation of the image equations, the fast inverse Laplace transform (FILT) was adopted and MULTI(FILT) was used for the simultaneous curve fitting to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters in the recirculatory model. Metoprolol as a test drug and cephalexin as a control drug were infused respectively into the femoral vein for 30 min, and arterial and venous blood samples were collected simultaneously through the cannula at the femoral artery and at right atrium during and after the infusion. Exponential functions were assumed for the weight functions through both the pulmonary and systemic circulations. Results of the curve fitting showed that the single-pass extraction ratio through the pulmonary circulation (Ep) of metoprolol was about 0.2, whereas that of cephalexin was negligible. The mean transit times through the pulmonary circulation (tp) of metoprolol and cephalexin were both about 0.5 min, which is small. The single-pass extraction ratios through the systemic circulation (Es) of metoprolol and cephalexin were both about 0.1, and the mean transit times through the systemic circulation (ts) were 11.5 min and 8.2 min, respectively.

Indexed as

PharmacokineticsAnimalsArteriesCephalexinLungMaleMetoprololModels, BiologicalPharmaceutical PreparationsRatsRats, Inbred StrainsSoftwareSpectrometry, FluorescenceStatistics as TopicVeinsCephalexinMetoprololPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID2023110
OpenAlexW1596139307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.