Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20230622›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2010

Effectiveness of adalimumab in treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis associated with enthesitis and peripheral arthritis.

Martin Rudwaleit, Pascal Claudepierre, Martina Kron, Sonja Kary, Robert Wong, Hartmut Kupper

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00478660 (Review of Safety and Efficacy With Adalimumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis - An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Response to Adalimumab in Patients Who Have Failed Standard Therapy or TNF-Alpha Inhibitors), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00478660 phase3completednot on this map

Review of Safety and Efficacy With Adalimumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis - An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Response to Adalimumab in Patients Who Have Failed Standard Therapy or TNF-Alpha Inhibitors (RHAPSODY)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbbottRan2006Enrolled1,250ConditionsAnkylosing SpondylitisArmsadalimumab (Humira)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Recommendation for the Management of Spondyloarthritis Patients in Kuwait.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developments in therapies for spondyloarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2012
    Review
  12. Spondyloarthritides: evolving therapies.Arthritis research & therapy · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin RudwaleitCharité-University Medicine Berlin, Benjamin Franklin Campus, Medical Department I, Rheumatology, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany. publications@jkmed.com
Pascal Claudepierre
Martina Kron
Sonja Kary
Robert Wong
Hartmut Kupper
Franklin University · USAbbott (Germany) · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of adalimumab in enthesitis and peripheral arthritis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

methodsAdults with active AS (Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index [BASDAI] > or = 4) received adalimumab 40 mg every other week with standard antirheumatic therapies in a 12-week, open-label study. Effectiveness in enthesitis was assessed using the Maastricht ankylosing spondylitis enthesitis score (MASES, 0-13) and by examining the plantar fascia in patients with enthesitis (> or = 1 inflamed enthesis) at baseline; effectiveness in peripheral arthritis was evaluated using tender and swollen joint counts (TJC, 0-46; SJC, 0-44) in patients with peripheral arthritis (> or = 1 swollen joint) at baseline. Overall effectiveness measures included Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 20% response (ASAS20).

resultsOf 1,250 patients enrolled, 686 had enthesitis and 281 had peripheral arthritis. In 667 patients with MASES > or = 1 at baseline, the median MASES was reduced from 5 at baseline to 1 at week 12. At week 12, inflammation of the plantar fascia ceased in 122 of 173 patients with inflammation at baseline. The median TJC in 281 patients with SJC > or = 1 at baseline was reduced from 5 at baseline to 1 at week 12; the median SJC improved from 2 to 0. ASAS20 responses were achieved by 70.5% of 457 patients with no enthesitis and no arthritis; 71.0% of 512 patients with only enthesitis; 68.0% of 107 patients with only arthritis; and 66.7% of 174 patients with both.

conclusionsTreatment with adalimumab improved enthesitis and peripheral arthritis in patients with active AS.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00478660.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansJointsMaleRheumatic DiseasesSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylitis, AnkylosingTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID20230622
PMCPMC2888191
OpenAlexW2097486992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.