Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20229376›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2010

The complexity of consent: women's experiences testing for HIV at an antenatal clinic in Durban, South Africa.

Allison K Groves, Suzanne Maman, Sibekezelo Msomi, Nduduzo Makhanya, Dhayendre Moodley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison K GrovesDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 319 Rosenau Hall, CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. grovesa@email.unc.edu
Suzanne Maman
Sibekezelo Msomi
Nduduzo Makhanya
Dhayendre Moodley
Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital · ZAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Efficacy of HIV Posttest Support for ANC in South AfricaR01HD050134 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAMAN, SUZANNE · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS 1-R01-HD050134001-A1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informed consent has historically been a cornerstone to ensuring autonomy during HIV testing. However, recent changes to global guidance on HIV testing have led to substantial debate on what policy provisions are necessary to ensure that consent remains meaningful in the context of testing. Despite disproportionate rates of testing during pregnancy, pregnant women's perspectives on the HIV testing process are underrepresented in the testing discourse. This study explores women's experiences with HIV testing and the consent process in a public antenatal clinic in South Africa. Qualitative interviews with 25 women were conducted at the clinic at either an antenatal visit or an infant immunization visit that followed HIV testing. Interviews were transcribed, translated, and coded for analysis. Women were categorized into one of the three groups based on their perceptions of choice in consenting for an HIV test. Matrices were used to allow for cross-category and cross-case comparison. Half of the women described having a clear choice in their decision to test. Others were less clear about their choice. Some women felt they had no choice in testing for HIV. None of the women stated that they were tested without having signed a consent form. We found that half of the women's narratives illustrated direct and indirect ways in which providers coerced them into taking an HIV test while receiving antenatal care. As the new guidance on HIV testing is implemented in different settings, it is critical to monitor women's testing experiences to ensure that a woman's right to make an informed, voluntary choice is not violated. Furthermore, models of testing that allow us to meet broader public health goals while simultaneously respecting women's autonomy are needed.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansInformed ConsentPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSouth AfricaUrban HealthYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20229376
PMCPMC2992088
OpenAlexW2016575810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.