Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20228811›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2010

Molecular control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics and chromosome oscillations.

Ana C Amaro, Catarina P Samora, René Holtackers, Enxiu Wang, Isabel J Kingston, Maria Alonso, Michael Lampson, Andrew D McAinsh, Patrick Meraldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure and function of the outer kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microtubule poleward flux as a target for modifying chromosome segregation errors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanical coupling coordinates microtubule growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Kinetochore Architecture Employs Diverse Linker Strategies Across Evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Kinetochore assembly throughout the cell cycle.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana C AmaroInstitute of Biochemistry, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Catarina P Samora
René Holtackers
Enxiu Wang
Isabel J Kingston
Maria Alonso
Michael Lampson
Andrew D McAinsh
Patrick Meraldi
ETH Zurich · CHMarie Curie · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CHCancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Regulation of cell division by mitotic kinasesR01GM083988 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRISHCHUK, EKATERINA L, LAMPSON, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2017
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome segregation in metazoans requires the alignment of sister kinetochores on the metaphase plate. During chromosome alignment, bioriented kinetochores move chromosomes by regulating the plus-end dynamics of the attached microtubules. The bundles of kinetochore-bound microtubules alternate between growth and shrinkage, leading to regular oscillations along the spindle axis. However, the molecular mechanisms that coordinate microtubule plus-end dynamics remain unknown. Here we show that centromere protein (CENP)-H, a subunit of the CENP-A nucleosome-associated and CENP-A distal complexes (CENP-A NAC/CAD), is essential for this coordination, because kinetochores lacking CENP-H establish bioriented attachments but fail to generate regular oscillations, as a result of an uncontrolled rate of microtubule plus-end turnover. These alterations lead to rapid erratic movements that disrupt metaphase plate organization. We also show that the abundance of the CENP-A NAC/CAD subunits CENP-H and CENP-I dynamically change on individual sister kinetochores in vivo, because they preferentially bind the sister kinetochore attached to growing microtubules, and that one other subunit, CENP-Q, binds microtubules in vitro. We therefore propose that CENP-A NAC/CAD is a direct regulator of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics, which physically links centromeric DNA to microtubule plus ends.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationMetaphaseSignal TransductionAutoantigensBiosensing TechniquesCell Cycle ProteinsCentromere Protein AChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosomes, HumanDNA-Binding ProteinsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHeLa CellsHumansKinetochoresMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrotubulesAutoantigensCell Cycle ProteinsCENPA protein, humanCENPH protein, humanCENPI protein, humanCentromere Protein AChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID20228811
PMCPMC2909587
OpenAlexW2067875248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.