Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20227760›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2010

Stimulation of in vivo angiogenesis by in situ crosslinked, dual growth factor-loaded, glycosaminoglycan hydrogels.

Roberto Elia, Peter W Fuegy, Aaron VanDelden, Matthew A Firpo, Glenn D Prestwich, Robert A Peattie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Kidney regeneration approaches for translation.World journal of urology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Thiol-Mediated Chemoselective Strategies forGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hyaluronic acid-based clinical biomaterials derived for cell and molecule delivery in regenerative medicine.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2011
    Review
  20. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto EliaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA. roberto.elia@tufts.edu
Peter W Fuegy
Aaron VanDelden
Matthew A Firpo
Glenn D Prestwich
Robert A Peattie
Oregon State University · USTufts University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Engineering the Vocal Fold MucosaR01DC004336 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2000 to 2026
$14.6M
Crosslinkable Hydrogels for Growth Factor ReleaseR21EB004514 · NIBIB · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PEATTIE, ROBERT A. · 2004 to 2005
$332k
NIBIB NIH HHS EB004514NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB004514NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of a study of elicited angiogenesis, hyaluronan (HA)-based hydrogels crosslinked by polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) were loaded with combinations of the cytokine growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). GF release in vivo was controlled by covalent incorporation of thiol-modified heparin into thiolated HA hydrogels, which were injected into the ear pinnae of mice and allowed to crosslink in situ. GF release in vivo was controlled by covalent incorporation of thiol-modified heparin in the gels. The ears were harvested at 7 or 14 days post-implantation, and vascularization evaluated via a Neovascularization Index (NI). The study demonstrates that in situ gelling implants produced no gross inflammation, redness or swelling, and an improved tolerance compared to HA-based dry film implants. All treatments showed significantly more vascularization than either contralateral ears or ears receiving a sham surgery. The maximum response was observed after 14 days in the ears receiving 0.3% Hp, gelatin-containing gels loaded with VEGF + KGF (NI = 3.91). The study revealed injected growth factor-loaded HA-based hydrogels can successfully produce localized controllable vascularization, while minimizing tissue necrosis, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and inflammation. The ability to target and controllably release growth factors can prove a useful tool in specific diseased tissue/organ angiogenesis.

Indexed as

Angiopoietin-1AnimalsFibroblast Growth Factor 7GlycosaminoglycansHeparinHydrogelsMiceMolecular StructureNeovascularization, PhysiologicPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiopoietin-1Fibroblast Growth Factor 7GlycosaminoglycansHeparinHydrogelsPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID20227760
PMCPMC2871388
OpenAlexW2012420763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.