Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20226686›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2010

Tumor immunogenicity and responsiveness to cancer vaccine therapy: the state of the art.

Taylor H Schreiber, Luis Raez, Joseph D Rosenblatt, Eckhard R Podack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Exploring immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
  3. Novel Mouse Models for Cancer Immunology.Annual review of cancer biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immune therapy for human papillomaviruses-related cancers.World journal of clinical oncology · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taylor H SchreiberDepartmentof Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101, United States.
Luis Raez
Joseph D Rosenblatt
Eckhard R Podack

Funding

REGULATION OF ANTI-TUMOR IMMUNITYP01CA109094 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DEYEV, VADIM V · 2007 to 2011
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS 5P01CA109094NCI NIH HHS P01 CA109094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite enormous effort, promising pre-clinical data in animal studies and over 900 clinical trials in the United States, no cancer vaccine has ever been approved for clinical use. Over the past decade a great deal of progress has been in both laboratory and clinical studies defining the interactions between developing tumors and the immune system. The results of these studies provide a rationale that may help explain the failure of recent therapeutic cancer vaccines in terms of vaccine principles, in selecting which tumors are the most appropriate to target and instruct the design and implementation of state-of-the-art cancer vaccines.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, ActiveCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20226686
PMCPMC2884069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.