Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20225117›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2010

Ultrasound of the bowel in children: how we do it.

Kassa Darge, Sudha Anupindi, Hilari Keener, Oliver Rompel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. darge@email.chop.edu
Sudha Anupindi
Hilari Keener
Oliver Rompel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in US like high-resolution transducers, harmonic imaging and panoramic modality have overcome some of the obstacles for sonography of the small and large bowel that existed in the past. In a number of centers, bowel US is an established routine method both in adults in children. Bowel US has the distinct advantages of being widely available, relatively cheap, free of radiation and easy to perform. In addition, US of the bowel demonstrates both mural and extramural pathological changes. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have frequent imaging studies due to disease recurrences and need of follow-up after treatment. Thus this group of pediatric patients benefits most from an optimized and standardized bowel US. This review provides a comprehensive step-by-step approach how to perform US of the bowel in children with emphasis on imaging inflammatory bowel changes. It is meant to serve like a recipe and facilitate the routine performance of US of the bowel in children.

Indexed as

ChildHumansImage EnhancementInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIntestinesUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.