Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20225084›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2010

Lung cancer progression and metastasis from the prognostic point of view.

Kentaro Inamura, Yuichi Ishikawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Progress and application of lung-on-a-chip for lung cancer.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomics screens for metastasis genes.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kentaro InamuraDepartment of Pathology, The Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), 135-8550 Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi Ishikawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men and women worldwide. Since the occurrence of metastases in distant organs is the major reason for mortality of cancer patients, we need to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Many studies featuring analysis of gene expression, comparative genomic hybridization and loss of heterozygosity analysis have been performed and generated support for the hypothesis that metastatic potential is acquired early in tumorigenesis. Furthermore, it is now clear that the majority of tumor cells have the potential to metastasize. Although many changes in gene expression profiles have been established retrospectively, translational research is now a high priority to enable clinical application and treatment based on laboratory findings.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingHomeodomain ProteinsHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisTranscription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsHOXB2 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.