Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20224948›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2010

[Lazarus phenomenon. Spontaneous return of circulation after cardiac arrest and cessation of resuscitation attempts].

C H R Wiese, U E Bartels, S Orso, B M Graf

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C H R WieseKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg. christoph.wiese@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
U E Bartels
S Orso
B M Graf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the medical literature the Lazarus phenomenon is defined as the spontaneous return of circulation (SROC) after cessation of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Based on published literature recommendations concerning the treatment of patients after cessation of resuscitation and reasons for the Lazarus phenomenon are discussed.

methodsA literature search in Medline, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Google from 1982 to 2009 was carried out for the terms "Lazarus phenomenon", "cessation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)", "spontaneous return of circulation (SROC)", "resuscitation and spontaneous defibrillation", "spontaneous recovery and cardiopulmonary resuscitation". Related secondary literature which was cited in the relevant articles was included as well as publications found in our personal literature base.

resultsMore than 10,000 articles and comments could be recovered and of these 45 were considered to be medically relevant articles (letters to the Editor, abstracts, case reports and literature reviews).

conclusionsIn the relevant medical literature, the Lazarus phenomenon is a rare occurrence. It seems to be a phenomenon which has often been described in non-medical literature but not published in medical literature. The pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. In the literature several mechanisms are discussed which could be important for this phenomenon, e.g. autopositive end-expiratory pressure, hyperventilation and alkalosis, hyperkalemia, delayed action of drugs and unobserved minimal vital signs. In the literature it is recommended that patients should be passively monitored for at least 10 min after cessation of resuscitation. However, more scientific experimental investigations seem to be necessary to gain a better understanding of this phenomenon.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualDeathFemaleHeart ArrestHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission, Spontaneous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.