Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20224825›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2010

The association between proximity to animal feeding operations and community health: a systematic review.

Annette M O'Connor, Brent Auvermann, Danelle Bickett-Weddle, Steve Kirkhorn, Jan M Sargeant, Alejandro Ramirez, Susanna G Von Essen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Precarious Essential Work, Immigrant Dairy Farmworkers, and Occupational Health Experiences in Vermont.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Intensive Livestock Farming and Residential Health: Experts' Views.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  6. Bioaerosols Play a Major Role in the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Content in Agricultural Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  7. Are Advanced Providers Prepared to Care for the Agricultural Population?The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Slaughterhouses Fungal Burden Assessment: A Contribution for the Pursuit of a Better Assessment Strategy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  10. Interaction of the role of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in Emerging Infectious Diseases (EIDS).Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Industrial Food Animal Production and Community Health.Current environmental health reports · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Respiratory health effects of large animal farming environments.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annette M O'ConnorDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America. oconnor@iastate.edu
Brent Auvermann
Danelle Bickett-Weddle
Steve Kirkhorn
Jan M Sargeant
Alejandro Ramirez
Susanna G Von Essen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA systematic review was conducted for the association between animal feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals living near AFOs. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe review was restricted to studies reporting respiratory, gastrointestinal and mental health outcomes in individuals living near AFOs in North America, European Union, United Kingdom, and Scandinavia. From June to September 2008 searches were conducted in PUBMED, CAB, Web-of-Science, and Agricola with no restrictions. Hand searching of narrative reviews was also used. Two reviewers independently evaluated the role of chance, confounding, information, selection and analytic bias on the study outcome. Nine relevant studies were identified. The studies were heterogeneous with respect to outcomes and exposures assessed. Few studies reported an association between surrogate clinical outcomes and AFO proximity. A negative association was reported when odor was the measure of exposure to AFOs and self-reported disease, the measure of outcome. There was evidence of an association between self-reported disease and proximity to AFO in individuals annoyed by AFO odor. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There was inconsistent evidence of a weak association between self-reported disease in people with allergies or familial history of allergies. No consistent dose response relationship between exposure and disease was observable.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimal FeedAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureEuropean UnionGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansInhalation ExposureMental HealthNorth AmericaRespiratory Tract DiseasesScandinavian and Nordic CountriesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID20224825
PMCPMC2835738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.