ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010
Mortality among contraceptive pill users: cohort evidence from Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Hormonal Contraceptive Use and Risk of Attempted and Completed Suicide: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2020Pooled it
- Adverse effects of the common treatments for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2013Pooled it
- Contraceptive efficacy of oral and transdermal hormones when co-administered with protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected women: pharmacokinetic results of ACTG trial A5188.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2010Trial
- Hormonal contraception and the risk of suicidal behaviour: a Swedish nationwide register-based study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Review
- The risk of endocrine interventions in carriers of a genetic predisposition for breast and gynecologic cancers: recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Use of systemic hormonal contraception and risk of attempted suicide: a nested case-control study.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Review
- The impact of female sex hormones on cardiovascular disease: from mechanisms to hormone therapy.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Alterations of cardiometabolic risk profile in polycystic ovary syndrome: 13 years follow-up in an unselected population.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Article
- Disparities in the prevalence of suicidal ideation according to oral contraceptive pill use among US women: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Associations of Oral Contraceptive Use With Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Death: Evidence From the UK Biobank Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Women's health, hormonal balance, and personal autonomy.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Analysis of Adverse Events and Medical Errors in Long-Term Hormone Treatments for Endometriosis: A Study Based on the US Food and Drug Administration Event Reporting System.International journal of women's health · 2022Article
- Hormone therapy and melanoma in women.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021Review
- Oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: an international cohort study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Prior Oral Contraceptive Use and Longer Term Mortality Outcomes in Women with Suspected Ischemic Heart Disease.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Article
- Surgical treatment and fertility perservation in endometrial cancer.Radiology and oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo see if the mortality risk among women who have used oral contraceptives differs from that of never users.
designProspective cohort study started in 1968 with mortality data supplied by participating general practitioners, National Health Service central registries, or both.
setting1400 general practices throughout the United Kingdom.
participants46 112 women observed for up to 39 years, resulting in 378 006 woman years of observation among never users of oral contraception and 819 175 among ever users.
main outcome measuresDirectly standardised adjusted relative risks between never and ever users for all cause and cause specific mortality.
results1747 deaths occurred in never users of oral contraception and 2864 in ever users. Compared with never users, ever users of oral contraception had a significantly lower rate of death from any cause (adjusted relative risk 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.93). They also had significantly lower rates of death from all cancers; large bowel/rectum, uterine body, and ovarian cancer; main gynaecological cancers combined; all circulatory disease; ischaemic heart disease; and all other diseases. They had higher rates of violent deaths. No association between overall mortality and duration of oral contraceptive use was observed, although some disease specific relations were apparent. An increased relative risk of death from any cause between ever users and never users was observed in women aged under 45 years who had stopped using oral contraceptives 5-9 years previously but not in those with more distant use. The estimated absolute reduction in all cause mortality among ever users of oral contraception was 52 per 100 000 woman years.
conclusionOral contraception was not associated with an increased long term risk of death in this large UK cohort; indeed, a net benefit was apparent. The balance of risks and benefits, however, may vary globally, depending on patterns of oral contraception usage and background risk of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.