ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2010
Estimation of the applicability domain of kernel-based machine learning models for virtual screening.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty Quantification with Domain Classification Models for Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Toxicity Prediction Using Chemical Structures: Pillars for Success in the Real World.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Review
- Reformulating Reactivity Design for Data-Efficient Machine Learning.ACS catalysis · 2023Article
- Federated Learning in Computational Toxicology: An Industrial Perspective on the Effiris Hackathon.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023Article
- Krein support vector machine classification of antimicrobial peptides.Digital discovery · 2023Article
- Anti-Ebola: an initiative to predict Ebola virus inhibitors through machine learning.Molecular diversity · 2022Article
- Computational Prediction of Compound-Protein Interactions for Orphan Targets Using CGBVS.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Applicability Domains of QSPR Models for Chemical Reactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence in chemistry and drug design.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
- Enhanced ranking of PknB Inhibitors using data fusion methods.Journal of cheminformatics · 2013Article
- jCompoundMapper: An open source Java library and command-line tool for chemical fingerprints.Journal of cheminformatics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe virtual screening of large compound databases is an important application of structural-activity relationship models. Due to the high structural diversity of these data sets, it is impossible for machine learning based QSAR models, which rely on a specific training set, to give reliable results for all compounds. Thus, it is important to consider the subset of the chemical space in which the model is applicable. The approaches to this problem that have been published so far mostly use vectorial descriptor representations to define this domain of applicability of the model. Unfortunately, these cannot be extended easily to structured kernel-based machine learning models. For this reason, we propose three approaches to estimate the domain of applicability of a kernel-based QSAR model.
resultsWe evaluated three kernel-based applicability domain estimations using three different structured kernels on three virtual screening tasks. Each experiment consisted of the training of a kernel-based QSAR model using support vector regression and the ranking of a disjoint screening data set according to the predicted activity. For each prediction, the applicability of the model for the respective compound is quantitatively described using a score obtained by an applicability domain formulation. The suitability of the applicability domain estimation is evaluated by comparing the model performance on the subsets of the screening data sets obtained by different thresholds for the applicability scores. This comparison indicates that it is possible to separate the part of the chemspace, in which the model gives reliable predictions, from the part consisting of structures too dissimilar to the training set to apply the model successfully. A closer inspection reveals that the virtual screening performance of the model is considerably improved if half of the molecules, those with the lowest applicability scores, are omitted from the screening.
conclusionThe proposed applicability domain formulations for kernel-based QSAR models can successfully identify compounds for which no reliable predictions can be expected from the model. The resulting reduction of the search space and the elimination of some of the active compounds should not be considered as a drawback, because the results indicate that, in most cases, these omitted ligands would not be found by the model anyway.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.