Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20222947›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Depletion of the non-coding regulatory 6S RNA in E. coli causes a surprising reduction in the expression of the translation machinery.

Thomas Neusser, Tino Polen, René Geissen, Rolf Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcriptional landscape of metal-resistantJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 6S RNA-Dependent Susceptibility to RNA Polymerase Inhibitors.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  6. Involvement ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Ms1 RNA Interacts With the RNA Polymerase Core inFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Gene Regulation and Transcriptomics.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Regulation of Global Transcription inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas NeusserInstitut für Physikalische Biologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstr 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tino Polen
René Geissen
Rolf Wagner
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEForschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background6S RNA from E. coli is known to bind to RNA polymerase interfering with transcription initiation. Because 6S RNA concentrations are maximal at stationary phase and binding occurs preferentially to the holoenzyme associated with sigma(70) (Esigma(70)) it is believed that 6S RNA supports adjustment to stationary phase transcription. Previous studies have also suggested that inhibition is specific for sigma(70)-dependent promoters characterized by a weak -35 recognition motif or extended -10 promoters. There are many exceptions to this precept, showing that other types of promoters, including stationary phase-specific (sigma(38)-dependent) promoters are inhibited.

resultsTo solve this apparent ambiguity and to better understand the role of 6S RNA in stationary phase transition we have performed a genome-wide transcriptional analysis of wild-type and 6S RNA deficient cells growing to mid-log or early stationary phase. We found 245 genes at the exponential growth phase and 273 genes at the early stationary phase to be > or = 1.5-fold differentially expressed. Up- and down-regulated genes include many transcriptional regulators, stress-related proteins, transporters and several enzymes involved in purine metabolism. As the most striking result during stationary phase, however, we obtained in the 6S RNA deficient strain a concerted expression reduction of genes constituting the translational apparatus. In accordance, primer extension analysis showed that transcription of ribosomal RNAs, representing the key molecules for ribosome biogenesis, is also significantly reduced under the same conditions. Consistent with this finding biochemical analysis of the 6S RNA deficient strain indicates that the lack of 6S RNA is apparently compensated by an increase of the basal ppGpp concentration, known to affect growth adaptation and ribosome biogenesis.

conclusionsThe analysis demonstrated that the effect of 6S RNA on transcription is not strictly confined to sigma(70)-dependent promoters. Moreover, the results indicate that 6S RNA is embedded in stationary phase adaptation, which is governed by the capacity of the translational machinery.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscription, GeneticEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, BacterialRNA, Untranslated6S RNARNA, BacterialRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID20222947
PMCPMC2848244
OpenAlexW2082965031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.