Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20220156›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

Identification of atypical Rhodococcus-like clinical isolates as Dietzia spp. by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Lilian Pilares, Jesús Agüero, José A Vázquez-Boland, Luis Martínez-Martínez, Jesús Navas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stage-associated enrichment ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. IDCases · 2022
    Article
  5. Complete Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification ofCase reports in infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of human clinical isolates of Dietzia species previously misidentified as Rhodococcus equi.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lilian PilaresDepartment of Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Cantabria University, and Service of Microbiology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Jesús Agüero
José A Vázquez-Boland
Luis Martínez-Martínez
Jesús Navas

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhodococcus equi and Dietzia spp. are closely related actinomycetes that show similar phenotypic properties. In humans, R. equi is an opportunistic pathogen associated with severe immunodeficiency. Dietzia spp. are environmental bacteria that have been isolated recently from clinical material and are presumptively associated with human infections. During the last 5 years, 15 bacterial isolates from human clinical samples collected at the Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain, were identified as R. equi by the API Coryne test. 16S rRNA gene sequencing confirmed seven isolates to be true R. equi strains, whereas the other eight were identified as members of the genus Dietzia, including Dietzia maris (four isolates), Dietzia natronolimnaea (two isolates), and Dietzia timorensis and Dietzia sp. (one isolate each). The eight Dietzia isolates were highly sensitive to 12 antimicrobial compounds.

Indexed as

PhylogenyActinomycetalesActinomycetales InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansMolecular Sequence DataRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASpainDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID20220156
PMCPMC2863862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.