Trial reportHaematologica2010
Evaluation of the (R)VAD+C regimen for the treatment of newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. Combined results of two prospective phase II trials from the French GOELAMS group.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00285389 (Treatment in First Line of Mantle Cell Lymphoma for Patients Under 66 Years by the VAD-CHLORAMBUCIL -Rituximab Regimen Followed by Intensification and Autologous PBSC Transplantation After Marrow Purging With Rituximab), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment in First Line of Mantle Cell Lymphoma for Patients Under 66 Years by the VAD-CHLORAMBUCIL -Rituximab Regimen Followed by Intensification and Autologous PBSC Transplantation After Marrow Purging With Rituximab
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Survival benefit of mantle cell lymphoma patients enrolled in clinical trials; a joint study from the LYSA group and French cancer registries.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018Trial
- Trial
- A multicenter phase II trial (SAKK 36/06) of single-agent everolimus (RAD001) in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.Haematologica · 2012Trial
- Treatment of the elderly patient with mantle cell lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2016Review
- Mantle cell lymphoma in the era of precision medicine-diagnosis, biomarkers and therapeutic agents.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Trends in incidence, treatment and survival of aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Netherlands 1989-2010.Haematologica · 2015Article
- How to manage mantle cell lymphoma.Leukemia · 2014Article
- Specific features identify patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma benefitting from autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2013Article
- Initial therapy of mantle cell lymphoma.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2011Article
- Stage IV marginal zone B-cell lymphoma--prognostic factors and the role of rituximab: Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL) study.Cancer science · 2010Article
- Front-line treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.Haematologica · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 17 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledBackground There is currently no international consensus for first-line treatment (prior to autologous stem cell transplantation) in mantle cell lymphoma patients. Here, we investigated the efficacy and tolerance of VAD associated with chlorambucil (VAD+C) and rituximab or not before autologous stem cell transplantation. DESIGN AND
methodsBetween 1996 and 2005, 113 previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma patients were enrolled in two consecutive prospective phase II studies. Responses and response factors to the (R)VAD+C regimen were evaluated. The survival prognostic value of the MIPI score and Ki67 were also analyzed.
resultsThe induction phase of 4 courses of (R)VAD+C showed very low hematologic and extra-hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4 thrombopenia and neutropenia, 9% and 2.7%, respectively and grade 3-4 extra-hematologic toxicities, 1.6%). Overall and complete response rates were 73% and 46%, respectively, and rose to 83% and 51% for the 70% of patients with less than two independent response factors (LDH, B symptoms and lymphocytosis). At the end of treatment, 65% of patients were in complete remission. Progression free and overall survival were significantly better in the transplanted population. The MIPI score was confirmed as a predictor of survival. Ki67, serum LDH, Performance Status (PS) and B symptoms were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival. A prognostic scoring system could stratify patients into three risk groups with markedly different median overall survival of 112, 44 and 11 months, respectively. Conclusions The (R)VAD+C is an effective regimen with very low toxicity. In addition to the MIPI score, Ki67 expression provides additional independent prognostic information for the prediction of overall survival (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00285389).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.