Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20219883›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2010

Performance of the Enferplex TB assay with cattle in Great Britain and assessment of its suitability as a test to distinguish infected and vaccinated animals.

Clare Whelan, Adam O Whelan, Eduard Shuralev, Hang Fai Kwok, Glyn Hewinson, John Clarke, H Martin Vordermeier

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. B Cell and Antibody Responses in Bovine Tuberculosis.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Antibody Tests forVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immune response biomarkers in human and veterinary research.Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases · 2018
    Review
  11. Use of the Human Vaccine,Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Clare WhelanEnfer Scientific, Unit T, M7 Business Park, Newhall, Naas, Kildare, Ireland.
Adam O Whelan
Eduard Shuralev
Hang Fai Kwok
Glyn Hewinson
John Clarke
H Martin Vordermeier
Bord na Móna (Ireland) · IEVeterinary Medicines Directorate · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, simple, and accurate antemortem tests for tuberculosis (TB) in cattle need to be developed in order to augment the existing screening methods. In particular, as cattle vaccines are developed, such tests would allow the continuation of test-and-slaughter policies alongside vaccination. Therefore, the development of an assay that distinguishes infected from vaccinated animals (a DIVA test) is an urgent research requirement. In this study, we assessed the performance of a novel multiplex serological test with sera collected from 96 skin-tested animals with bovine tuberculosis, 93 TB-free animals, and 39 cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Our results indicate that the test has a relative sensitivity range of 77.0% to 86.5% at corresponding specificity levels of 100.0% to 77.6%. Comparison with the Bovigam gamma interferon antemortem test revealed that this serology test was significantly more sensitive at specificities above 97.9%, while the Bovigam test was, on average, about 10% more sensitive when the test specificity was set below 97%. Importantly, this serological multiplex assay does not react with sera from BCG-vaccinated calves and is therefore suitable as a DIVA test alongside BCG-based vaccine strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnosis, DifferentialImmunoassayMycobacterium bovisSensitivity and SpecificitySerumTuberculosis, BovineTuberculosis VaccinesUnited KingdomTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20219883
PMCPMC2863378
OpenAlexW2145782050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.