Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20219869›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2010

Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration.

James G Tidball, S Armando Villalta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 597 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
597citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
55.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

597 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,073 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

537 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

James G TidballMolecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Program, Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California-Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA. jtidball@physci.ucla.edu
S Armando Villalta
Laboratoire d’immunologie intégrative du cancer · FR

Funding

Myeloid Cell Function in Muscle Injury and RepairR01AR047855 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIDBALL, JAMES G · 2001 to 2011
$2.9M
Myeloid Cell Function in Muscular DystrophyR01AR047721 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIDBALL, JAMES G · 2001 to 2005
$1.9M
Immune and muscle cell interactions that modulate dystrophinopathyF31AR054724 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI VILLALTA, SERGIO ARMANDO · 2006 to 2008
$76k
NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR054724NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047721NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047855NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR47721NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR47855NIA NIH HHS R01 AR/AG054451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent discoveries reveal complex interactions between skeletal muscle and the immune system that regulate muscle regeneration. In this review, we evaluate evidence that indicates that the response of myeloid cells to muscle injury promotes muscle regeneration and growth. Acute perturbations of muscle activate a sequence of interactions between muscle and inflammatory cells. The initial inflammatory response is a characteristic Th1 inflammatory response, first dominated by neutrophils and subsequently by CD68(+) M1 macrophages. M1 macrophages can propagate the Th1 response by releasing proinflammatory cytokines and cause further tissue damage through the release of nitric oxide. Myeloid cells in the early Th1 response stimulate the proliferative phase of myogenesis through mechanisms mediated by TNF-alpha and IL-6; experimental prolongation of their presence is associated with delayed transition to the early differentiation stage of myogenesis. Subsequent invasion by CD163(+)/CD206(+) M2 macrophages attenuates M1 populations through the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10. M2 macrophages play a major role in promoting growth and regeneration; their absence greatly slows muscle growth following injury or modified use and inhibits muscle differentiation and regeneration. Chronic muscle injury leads to profiles of macrophage invasion and function that differ from acute injuries. For example, mdx muscular dystrophy yields invasion of muscle by M1 macrophages, but their early invasion is accompanied by a subpopulation of M2a macrophages. M2a macrophages are IL-4 receptor(+)/CD206(+) cells that reduce cytotoxicity of M1 macrophages. Subsequent invasion of dystrophic muscle by M2c macrophages is associated with progression of the regenerative phase in pathophysiology. Together, these findings show that transitions in macrophage phenotype are an essential component of muscle regeneration in vivo following acute or chronic muscle damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmune SystemMacrophagesMuscle, SkeletalMuscular DystrophiesNeutrophilsRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID20219869
PMCPMC2867520
OpenAlexW2112039060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.