Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20218746›Full record

ArticlePaediatric drugs2010

Published pediatric randomized drug trials in developing countries, 1996-2002.

Khairun N B Nor Aripin, Helen M Sammons, Imti Choonara

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01301625 (A Prospective Single Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the MitraClip System in Australia and New Zealand), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01301625 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Single Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the MitraClip System in Australia and New Zealand

TypeobservationalSponsorAbbott Medical DevicesRan2011 to 2014Enrolled78ConditionsMitral RegurgitationArmsMitraClip Implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Paediatric drugs trials in China.BMJ paediatrics open · 2020
    Article
  3. Clinical trials in children.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Khairun N B Nor AripinAcademic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby DE22 3DT, UK. mgxknbn@nottingham.ac.uk
Helen M Sammons
Imti Choonara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe greatest burden of disease in children lies in the developing world; however, previous reviews have suggested that few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children take place in developing countries. Children in developing countries deserve the same standard of medicines as those in developed countries, i.e. appropriate medications for the specific diseases that occur.

objectiveTo elucidate published pediatric therapeutic RCTs that have taken place in the developing world and to determine whether they are appropriate for the major diseases occurring there, and to explore their approach to safety monitoring.

methodsA previously assembled database of pediatric RCTs published between 1996 and 2002, from journals indexed in MEDLINE, was analyzed. The main country of setting of the RCTs was categorized as having low, medium or high development status according to the Human Development Index (HDI). Articles were read to add the WHO International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) category of the disease studied, the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system category of the main drug therapy studied, the source of funding, and ethical approval to the variables already recorded in the database.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-eight (22%) of the 733 RCTs analyzed took place in medium and low HDI (developing) countries. The disease areas studied seemed appropriate, with 89 (56%) of the 158 RCTs studying infectious and parasitic diseases. Ninety-nine (63%) RCTs from developing countries were trials of antiparasitic and anti-infective drugs. Compared with studies from high HDI countries, a significantly lower proportion of articles from medium and low HDI countries mentioned ethical committee or institutional review board approval, and safety monitoring. Only one paper from low and medium HDI countries mentioned the presence of a safety monitoring committee/data safety monitoring board.

conclusionsPublished pediatric drug RCTs conducted in developing countries appear to study appropriate diseases but the results show that fewer RCTs are undertaken compared with the developed world. The standard of reporting for RCTs from developing countries needs attention to ensure that adequate information can be obtained, especially with regard to safety monitoring.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsChildClinical Trials Data Monitoring CommitteesDeveloping CountriesHuman DevelopmentHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMEDLINEPharmaceutical PreparationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorld Health OrganizationPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.