ArticlePaediatric drugs2010
Published pediatric randomized drug trials in developing countries, 1996-2002.
Article in Paediatric drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01301625 (A Prospective Single Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the MitraClip System in Australia and New Zealand), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Single Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the MitraClip System in Australia and New Zealand
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conducting Drug Treatment Trials in Children: Opportunities and Challenges.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2024Review
- Paediatric drugs trials in China.BMJ paediatrics open · 2020Article
- Clinical trials in children.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Review
- Clinical trials in neonates and children: Report of the pulmonary hypertension academic research consortium pediatric advisory committee.Pulmonary circulation · 2013Article
- Pediatric versus adult drug trials for conditions with high pediatric disease burden.Pediatrics · 2012Article
- Pediatric clinical trials in Latin America and Guyana: present views of local practitioners and ways to embrace the future.Paediatric drugs · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe greatest burden of disease in children lies in the developing world; however, previous reviews have suggested that few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children take place in developing countries. Children in developing countries deserve the same standard of medicines as those in developed countries, i.e. appropriate medications for the specific diseases that occur.
objectiveTo elucidate published pediatric therapeutic RCTs that have taken place in the developing world and to determine whether they are appropriate for the major diseases occurring there, and to explore their approach to safety monitoring.
methodsA previously assembled database of pediatric RCTs published between 1996 and 2002, from journals indexed in MEDLINE, was analyzed. The main country of setting of the RCTs was categorized as having low, medium or high development status according to the Human Development Index (HDI). Articles were read to add the WHO International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) category of the disease studied, the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system category of the main drug therapy studied, the source of funding, and ethical approval to the variables already recorded in the database.
resultsOne hundred and fifty-eight (22%) of the 733 RCTs analyzed took place in medium and low HDI (developing) countries. The disease areas studied seemed appropriate, with 89 (56%) of the 158 RCTs studying infectious and parasitic diseases. Ninety-nine (63%) RCTs from developing countries were trials of antiparasitic and anti-infective drugs. Compared with studies from high HDI countries, a significantly lower proportion of articles from medium and low HDI countries mentioned ethical committee or institutional review board approval, and safety monitoring. Only one paper from low and medium HDI countries mentioned the presence of a safety monitoring committee/data safety monitoring board.
conclusionsPublished pediatric drug RCTs conducted in developing countries appear to study appropriate diseases but the results show that fewer RCTs are undertaken compared with the developed world. The standard of reporting for RCTs from developing countries needs attention to ensure that adequate information can be obtained, especially with regard to safety monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20218746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.