ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment2010
Relative expression analysis for molecular cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating bulk and single-cell transcriptome to identify novel gene markers for germinal center B cells (GCB) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Integrating prognosis-related genes with immune-related gene signature for development and validation of a survival stratification model for early-stage colorectal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Applications of gene pair methods in clinical research: advancing precision medicine.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Exploring protein relative relations in skeletal muscle proteomic analysis for insights into insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- M1 macrophage-related gene model for NSCLC immunotherapy response prediction.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024Article
- Ensemble methods of rank-based trees for single sample classification with gene expression profiles.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- A pairwise immune gene model for predicting overall survival and stratifying subtypes of colon adenocarcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Construction of a B cell-related gene pairs signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Individualized prognostic signature for pancreatic carcinoma validated by integrating immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs).Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Development and validation of a hypoxia-related gene pair signature to predict overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Stratification of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma to facilitate drug repositioning.iScience · 2021Article
- A novel immune-related gene pair prognostic signature for predicting overall survival in bladder cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Development and validation of an individualized DNA repair-related gene signature in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Prognostic Implications of Immune-Related Gene Pairs Signatures in Bladder Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Identification and Verification of a 17 Immune-Related Gene Pair Prognostic Signature for Colon Cancer.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- An Immune-Related Gene Pairs Signature Predicts Prognosis and Immune Heterogeneity in Glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Establishment of an immune-related gene pair model to predict colon adenocarcinoma prognosis.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Development and validation of a RNA binding protein gene pair-associated prognostic signature for prediction of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Article
- Development and verification of a personalized immune prognostic feature in breast cancer.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The enormous amount of biomolecule measurement data generated from high-throughput technologies has brought an increased need for computational tools in biological analyses. Such tools can enhance our understanding of human health and genetic diseases, such as cancer, by accurately classifying phenotypes, detecting the presence of disease, discriminating among cancer sub-types, predicting clinical outcomes, and characterizing disease progression. In the case of gene expression microarray data, standard statistical learning methods have been used to identify classifiers that can accurately distinguish disease phenotypes. However, these mathematical prediction rules are often highly complex, and they lack the convenience and simplicity desired for extracting underlying biological meaning or transitioning into the clinic. In this review, we survey a powerful collection of computational methods for analyzing transcriptomic microarray data that address these limitations. Relative Expression Analysis (RXA) is based only on the relative orderings among the expressions of a small number of genes. Specifically, we provide a description of the first and simplest example of RXA, the K-TSP classifier, which is based on _ pairs of genes; the case K = 1 is the TSP classifier. Given their simplicity and ease of biological interpretation, as well as their invariance to data normalization and parameter-fitting, these classifiers have been widely applied in aiding molecular diagnostics in a broad range of human cancers. We review several studies which demonstrate accurate classification of disease phenotypes (e.g., cancer vs. normal), cancer subclasses (e.g., AML vs. ALL, GIST vs. LMS), disease outcomes (e.g., metastasis, survival), and diverse human pathologies assayed through blood-borne leukocytes. The studies presented demonstrate that RXA-specifically the TSP and K-TSP classifiers-is a promising new class of computational methods for analyzing high-throughput data, and has the potential to significantly contribute to molecular cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.