ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2010
How does your doctor talk with you? Preliminary validation of a brief patient self-report questionnaire on the quality of physician-patient interaction.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02674360 (Randomized Controlled Trial Regarding), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial Regarding (RCT) Innovative Dissemination Strategies for a Brief Shared Decision Making (SDM) Intervention for Oncologists: Web-based SDM Online Training and Individualized, Context-based Face-to-face SDM Training
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measurement of person-centred consultation skills among healthcare practitioners: a systematic review of reviews of validation studies.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Health engagement: a systematic review of tools modifiable for use with vulnerable pregnant women.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Assessing patient-centred communication in teaching: a systematic review of instruments.Medical education · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Nurse-Led Family Support Intervention for Families of Critically Ill Patients: The FICUS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Standard compared with mnemonic counseling for fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2015Trial
- Translation and validation of the Chinese version of quality of physician-patient interaction scale.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Multimodal Sensing and Modeling of Endocrine Therapy Adherence in Breast Cancer Survivors.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2025Article
- All providers Better Communication Skills (ABCs) program: protocol for a randomized controlled trial assessing communication training effectiveness with interprofessional clinicians.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Testing the ABCs of Serious Illness Program for Oncology Trainees: A Feasibility Trial Comparing Different Learning Formats for a Virtual Communication Curriculum.Palliative medicine reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating cancer patients' experiences with doctor-patient communication in Taiwan: development and validation of a new assessment instrument.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ) in children and adolescents: factor structure, reliability, validity, item parameters and interpretability of the parent version for practical use in Greece.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Multilevel approaches to address disparities in lung cancer screening: a study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Development of a Patient-Centered Pathway of Care for Retinoblastoma Patients: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.Oncology · 2024Article
- Concordance in the healthcare context: A concept analysis.Belitung nursing journal · 2024Article
- Video-telecare collaborative pain management during COVID-19: a single-arm feasibility study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality of physician-patient interaction is increasingly being recognized as an essential component of effective treatment. The present article reports on the development and validation of a brief patient self-report questionnaire (QQPPI) that assesses the quality of physician-patient interactions. Data were gathered from 147 patients and 19 physicians immediately after consultations in a tertiary care outpatient setting. The QQPPI displayed good psychometric properties, with high internal consistency and good item characteristics. The QQPPI total score showed variability between different physicians and was independent of patients' gender, age, and education. The QQPPI featured high correlations with other quality-related measures and was not influenced by social desirability, or patients' clinical characteristics. The QQPPI is a brief patient self-report questionnaire that allows assessment of the quality of physician-patient interactions during routine ambulatory care. It can also be used to evaluate physician communication training programs or for educational purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.