Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20217132›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2010

Combined detection of Her2/neu gene amplification and protein overexpression in effusions from patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

Birgitta Schlüter, Roswitha Gerhards, Dirk Strumberg, Rudolf Voigtmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pre-analytical issues in effusion cytology.Pleura and peritoneum · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birgitta SchlüterMarienhospital Herne, Medizinische Klinik III: Hämatologie und Onkologie, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany. birgitta.schlueter@marienhospital-herne.de
Roswitha Gerhards
Dirk Strumberg
Rudolf Voigtmann
Ruhr University Bochum · DEUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHer2/neu protein overexpression and gene amplification is found in 20-30% of breast cancer patients and correlates with poor clinical outcome. Patients who profit from anti-Her2/neu- therapy are routinely selected by examination of tumour specimens using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) separately. Many studies found a good correlation between both methods for score 1+ samples and for score 3+ samples, but not for score 2+ samples. In this study, we examined pleural and ascitic effusions with a combined approach using IHC and FISH on the same cells, under the following aspects: (1) frequency of Her2/neu protein expression and gene amplification in effusions; (2) correlation between score of protein expression and gene amplification; (3) impact of chromosome 17 polyploidy on Her2/neu protein expression.

methodsWe examined 31 effusions from patients with breast cancer and 4 effusions from patients with ovarian cancer. Cytospins were analysed by IHC using two anti-Her2/neu antibodies and subsequently analysed by FISH with Her2/neu/CEP17 probes. Amplification was defined as: (1) Her2/neu gene copy number of more than 4 and (2) Her2/neu/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater.

resultsA system combining IHC and FISH was developed and 35 effusion specimens were examined. As much as 25 of them were scored as positive. All of them contained cells with heterogeneous scores. A total of 18 of the samples contained cells with scores that ranged from 0 to 3+. In the other samples scores ranged from 0 to 1+ or 0 to 2+. Cells were analysed for Her2/neu gene amplification and chromosome 17 ploidy with regard to their scores. As much as 15 of all samples had mean Her2/neu copy numbers of >4, but only 12% (n = 3) of the positive samples were amplified according to Her2/neu/CEP17 ratio. Only 22, 9% (n = 8) were polyploid (mean CEP17 > 4); but 65, 7% (n = 23) of all specimens contained single polyploid cells. In some cases up to 100% of the score 3+ cells showed chromosome 17 polyploidy. Here protein overexpression might be caused by polyploidy rather than by gene amplification. In some samples, we found single cells with gene amplification but without protein expression and cells without amplification but with protein overexpression.

conclusionThe combination of IHC and FISH allows a differentiated analysis of single cells, which is especially important for effusions that are composed of heterogeneous cells. Therefore, cells with high gene amplification and/or protein overexpression can be detected and analysed even if their amount in the sample is small. Chromosome 17 polyploidy is important in some cases but this should be further examined on a larger series.

Indexed as

Ascitic FluidBreast NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOvarian NeoplasmsPleural EffusionERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID20217132
PMCPMC11827919
OpenAlexW2060370509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.