Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20217042›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2010

Microbiogical data, but not procalcitonin improve the accuracy of the clinical pulmonary infection score.

Boris Jung, Nathalie Embriaco, François Roux, Jean-Marie Forel, Didier Demory, Jérôme Allardet-Servent, Samir Jaber, Bernard La Scola, Laurent Papazian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomarkers in lower respiratory tract samples in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Guidelines for the Use of Procalcitonin for Rational Use of Antibiotics.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Boris JungIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care B (DAR B), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, INSERM ERI 25, Montpellier, France.
Nathalie Embriaco
François Roux
Jean-Marie Forel
Didier Demory
Jérôme Allardet-Servent
Samir Jaber
Bernard La Scola
Laurent Papazian
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRInstitut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Neurobiologie de la Méditerranée · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly and adequate treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is mandatory to improve the outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in medical ICU patients, the respective and combined impact of the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) gram staining, endotracheal aspirate and a biomarker (procalcitonin) for the early diagnosis of VAP.

designProspective, observational study

settingA medical intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Over an 8-month period, we prospectively included 57 patients suspected of having 86 episodes of VAP.

interventionThe day of suspicion, a BAL as well as alveolar and serum procalcitonin determinations and evaluation of CPIS were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 86 BAL performed, 48 were considered positive (cutoff of 10(4) cfu ml(-1)). We found no differences in alveolar or serum procalcitonin between VAP and non-VAP patients. Including procalcitonin in the CPIS score did not increase its accuracy (55%) for the diagnosis of VAP. The best tests to predict VAP were modified CPIS (threshold at 6) combined with microbiological data. Indeed, both routinely twice weekly performed endotracheal aspiration at a threshold of 10(5) cfu ml(-1) and BAL gram staining improved pre-test diagnostic accuracy of VAP (77 and 66%, respectively).

conclusionThis study showed that alveolar procalcitonin performed by BAL does not help the clinician to identify VAP. It confirmed that serum procalcitonin is not an accurate marker of VAP. In contrast, microbiological resources available at the time of VAP suspicion (BAL gram staining, last available endotracheal aspirate) combined or not with CPIS are helpful in distinguishing VAP diagnosed by BAL from patients with a negative BAL.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPrognosisProspective StudiesProtein PrecursorsSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID20217042
OpenAlexW2078226523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.