Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20216418›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in ophthalmology2010

Nutritional supplements for age-related macular degeneration.

Nupura Krishnadev, Annal D Meleth, Emily Y Chew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Antioxidants: a comprehensive review.Archives of toxicology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nupura KrishnadevNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Annal D Meleth
Emily Y Chew

Funding

Medical Retina FellowshipZIEEY000487 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KEENAN, TIARNAN · 2009 to 2025
$6.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIE EY000487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAge-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of visual loss in older adults, has limited therapeutic options. This review describes the current literature on the role of nutritional supplementation in primary and secondary prevention of AMD. RECENT

findingsMany observational studies have explored the association between diet, nutrient intake, and AMD. In particular, high dietary intakes of omega-3 fatty acids, and macular xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin have been associated with a lower risk of prevalent and incident AMD. However, the Age-Related Eye Disease study (AREDS) is the only large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial to show a 25% beneficial effect of nutritional supplementation in reducing the risk progression to advanced AMD in patients with intermediate AMD or with advanced AMD in one eye at 5 years of follow-up. On the basis of the results of AREDS, these patients are recommended to take AREDS formulation of vitamins C, E, beta-carotene, and zinc with copper. SUMMARY: At the present time, there is insufficient evidence in the literature to recommend routine nutritional supplementation in healthy adults for primary prevention of AMD. However, patients with intermediate risk of AMD or advanced AMD in one eye should consider taking AREDS-type supplements. Observational studies have also suggested benefit from increased dietary intake of macular xanthophylls and omega-3 fatty acids. These are currently being evaluated prospectively in a randomized controlled clinical trial, the AREDS2.

Indexed as

Nutritional SupportAntioxidantsFatty Acids, Omega-3HumansLuteinMacular DegenerationVitaminsXanthophyllsZeaxanthinsAntioxidantsFatty Acids, Omega-3LuteinVitaminsXanthophyllsZeaxanthins

Identifiers

PMID20216418
PMCPMC2909501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.