Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20216012›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Reliability and validity of the perspectives of Support From God Scale.

Jill B Hamilton, Jamie L Crandell, J Kameron Carter, Mary R Lynn

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Peer navigation in African American breast cancer survivors.Patient related outcome measures · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jill B HamiltonSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7460, USA. jhamilto@email.unc.edu
Jamie L Crandell
J Kameron Carter
Mary R Lynn
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The Grady Center for Health DisparitiesP60MD000525 · NIMHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LIPSCOMB, JOSEPH · 2003 to 2006
$3.7M
RESEARCH TRAINING--NURSING CARE TO OLDER PERSONST32NR007048 · NINR · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ARCHBOLD, PATRICIA G · 1988 to 2004
$1.3M
Helping Older African American Cancer Survivors CopeR01NR009271 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAMILTON, JILL B · 2006 to 2008
$763k
MODELS OF DELIVERY OF PRENATAL AND CHILDBIRTH CAREF31NR007048 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI STONE, PATRICIA W · 1995 to 1996
–
NIMHD NIH HHS 5P60-MD000525-01NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD001541NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000525NINR NIH HHS F31 NR007048NINR NIH HHS R01 NR009271NINR NIH HHS R01NR009271-04NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007048NINR NIH HHS T32 NR07048-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting spiritual support scales for use with cancer survivors focus on the support believed to come from a religious community, clergy, or health care providers.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a new measure of spiritual support believed to come from God in older Christian African American cancer survivors.

methodsThe Perceived Support From God Scale was administered to 317 African American cancer survivors aged 55-89 years. Psychometric evaluation involved identifying underlying factors, conducting item analysis and estimating reliability, and obtaining evidence on the relationship to other variables or the extent to which the Perceived Support From God Scale correlates with religious involvement and depression.

resultsThe Perceived Support From God Scale consists of 15 items in two subscales (Support From God and God's Purpose for Me). The two subscales explained 59% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were .94 and .86 for the Support From God and God's Purpose for Me subscales, respectively. Test-retest correlations were strong, supporting the temporal stability of the instrument. Pearson's correlations to an existing religious involvement and beliefs scale were moderate to strong. Subscale scores on Support From God were negatively correlated to depression. DISCUSSION: Initial support for reliability and validity was demonstrated for the Perceived Support From God Scale. The scale captures a facet of spirituality not emphasized in other measures. Further research is needed to evaluate the scale with persons of other racial/ethnic groups and to explore the relationship of spirituality to other outcome measures.

Indexed as

SpiritualityAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansInternal-External ControlMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNursing AssessmentPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20216012
PMCPMC2867661
OpenAlexW2080058013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.