Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20214911›Full record

ArticleMutation research2010

Preliminary examination of polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTZ1 in relation to semen quality.

Andrew F Olshan, Thomas J Luben, Nancy M Hanley, Sally D Perreault, Ronna L Chan, Amy H Herring, Patricia V Basta, David M DeMarini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Association ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Novel Mutations of TSPY1 Gene Associate Spermatogenic Failure Among Men.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. andy_olshan@unc.edu
Thomas J Luben
Nancy M Hanley
Sally D Perreault
Ronna L Chan
Amy H Herring
Patricia V Basta
David M DeMarini
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES10126NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018NIEHS NIH HHS T32ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental, lifestyle, and occupational exposures on semen quality have been investigated in epidemiological studies with inconsistent results. Genetic factors involved in toxicant activation and detoxification have been examined in relation to the risk of outcomes such as cancer, cardiovascular, and neurologic disorders. However, the effect of common genetic variants in the metabolism of toxicants on semen quality parameters has rarely been evaluated. In this analysis, we evaluated functional SNPs of three genes of the glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTZ1) enzyme family.

methodsParticipants were 228 presumed fertile men recruited as part of a community-based study. Semen outcome data from this study included total sperm count and concentration, sperm morphology, and sperm DNA integrity and chromatin maturity. DNA was obtained from 162 men from a mouth-rinse sample and genotyped for the presence of GSTT1-1 and GSTM1-1 null genotypes and the GSTZ1 SNPs at positions 94 (rs3177427) and 124 (rs3177429). We used multivariable linear regression to assess the relationship between each genotype and sperm outcomes.

resultsOverall, our results did not reveal a consistent pattern between GSTM1 and GSTZ genotypes and increased occurrence of adverse sperm outcomes. However, the GSTT1 non-null genotype yielded the coefficients with the largest magnitude for sperm count and sperm concentration (beta=-0.528, 95% CI -1.238 to 0.199 and beta=-0.353, 95% CI -0.708 to 0.001, respectively), suggesting that it might be adverse.

conclusionsThese results indicate that common polymorphisms in GST genes do not negatively impact sperm parameters in healthy men with good semen quality. Contrary to expectations, the GSTT1 non-null genotype was associated with reduced sperm concentration and count in semen. Further study with a larger study size and inclusion of gene-exposure interactions is warranted.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSperm CountGlutathione TransferaseHumansMaleSpermatozoaglutathione S-transferase T1Glutathione TransferaseGSTZ1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID20214911
PMCPMC3321349
OpenAlexW2066845651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.