Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20214410›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2010

Prediction of propofol clearance in children from an allometric model developed in rats, children and adults versus a 0.75 fixed-exponent allometric model.

Mariska Y M Peeters, Karel Allegaert, Heleen J Blussé van Oud-Alblas, Massimo Cella, Dick Tibboel, Meindert Danhof, Catherijne A J Knibbe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The use of PBPK modeling across the pediatric age range using propofol as a case.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
  14. Pharmacodynamic principles and target concentration intervention.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prediction of glucuronidated drug clearance in pediatrics (≤5 years): An allometric approach.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariska Y M PeetersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Karel Allegaert
Heleen J Blussé van Oud-Alblas
Massimo Cella
Dick Tibboel
Meindert Danhof
Catherijne A J Knibbe
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLCentre for Human Drug Research · NLKU Leuven · BELeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For propofol clearance, allometric scaling has been applied successfully for extrapolations between species (rats and humans) and within the human bodyweight range (children and adults). In this analysis, the human bodyweight range is explored to determine for which range an allometric model with a fixed or estimated exponent can be used to predict propofol clearance, without correction for maturation. The predictive value of the allometric equation, clearance (CL) is equal to 0.071 x bodyweight in kg0.78, which was developed from rats, children and adults, and the predictive value of a fixed exponent allometric model derived from the basal metabolic rate, CL is equal to CL standardized to a 70 kg adult x (bodyweight in kg standardized to a 70 kg adult)0.75, were evaluated across five independent patient groups including (i) 25 (pre)term neonates with a postmenstrual age of 27-43 weeks; (ii) 22 postoperative infants aged 4-18 months; (iii) 12 toddlers aged 1-3 years; (iv) 14 adolescents aged 10-20 years; and (v) 26 critically ill adults sedated long term. The median percentage error of the predictions was calculated using the equation %error = (CL(allometric) - CL(i))/CL(i) x 100, where CL(allometric) is the predicted propofol clearance from the allometric equations for each individual and CL(i) is the individual-predicted (post hoc) propofol clearance value derived from published population pharmacokinetic models. In neonates, the allometric model developed from rats, children and adults, and the fixed-exponent allometric model, systematically overpredicted individual propofol clearance, with median percentage errors of 288% and 216%, respectively, whereas in infants, both models systematically underpredicted individual propofol clearance, with median percentage errors of -43% and -55%, respectively. In toddlers, adolescents and adults, both models performed reasonably well, with median percentage errors of -12% and -32%, respectively, in toddlers, 16% and -14%, respectively, in adolescents, and 12% and -18%, respectively, in adults. Both allometric models based on bodyweight alone may be of use to predict propofol clearance in individuals older than 2 years. Approaches that also incorporate maturation are required to predict clearance under the age of 2 years.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlgorithmsAnesthetics, IntravenousAnimalsBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID20214410
OpenAlexW2059514609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.