Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20212107›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Gene duplication and the evolution of ribosomal protein gene regulation in yeast.

Ilan Wapinski, Jenna Pfiffner, Courtney French, Amanda Socha, Dawn Anne Thompson, Aviv Regev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Discovery of additional ancient genome duplications in yeasts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ribosome Structural Changes Dynamically Affect Ribosome Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Retention of duplicated genes in evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022
    Review
  11. Yeast Crf1p: An activator in need is an activator indeed.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  12. Regulation of ribosomal protein genes: An ordered anarchy.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilan WapinskiDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. ilan_wapinski@hms.harvard.edu
Jenna Pfiffner
Courtney French
Amanda Socha
Dawn Anne Thompson
Aviv Regev
Broad Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

The temporal reconfiguration of regulatory networks: From yeast to cancerDP1OD003958 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI REGEV, AVIV · 2008 to 2011
$3.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIH HHS DP1 OD003958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coexpression of genes within a functional module can be conserved at great evolutionary distances, whereas the associated regulatory mechanisms can substantially diverge. For example, ribosomal protein (RP) genes are tightly coexpressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but the cis and trans factors associated with them are surprisingly diverged across Ascomycota fungi. Little is known, however, about the functional impact of such changes on actual expression levels or about the selective pressures that affect them. Here, we address this question in the context of the evolution of the regulation of RP gene expression by using a comparative genomics approach together with cross-species functional assays. We show that an activator (Ifh1) and a repressor (Crf1) that control RP gene regulation in normal and stress conditions in S. cerevisiae are derived from the duplication and subsequent specialization of a single ancestral protein. We provide evidence that this regulatory innovation coincides with the duplication of RP genes in a whole-genome duplication (WGD) event and may have been important for tighter control of higher levels of RP transcripts. We find that subsequent loss of the derived repressor led to the loss of a stress-dependent repression of RPs in the fungal pathogen Candida glabrata. Our comparative computational and experimental approach shows how gene duplication can constrain and drive regulatory evolution and provides a general strategy for reconstructing the evolutionary trajectory of gene regulation across species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationCandida glabrataGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalGenome, FungalModels, GeneticRepressor ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomycesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpecies SpecificityTrans-ActivatorsCRF1 protein, S cerevisiaeIFH1 protein, S cerevisiaeRepressor ProteinsRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID20212107
PMCPMC2851827
OpenAlexW1987330798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.