Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20212089›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2010

Repair of global regulators in Staphylococcus aureus 8325 and comparative analysis with other clinical isolates.

Silvia Herbert, Anne-Kathrin Ziebandt, Knut Ohlsen, Tina Schäfer, Michael Hecker, Dirk Albrecht, Richard Novick, Friedrich Götz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 245 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
245citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

245 citing papers in PubMed, 375 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A broadly conserved gram-positive lipoprotein regulates cell elongation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Paenidepsins are a Family of Lipopeptides fromJournal of natural products · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. E3 ubiquitin ligase SKP2 limits autophagosome formation duringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  17. NorA and Tet38 efflux pumps enableAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Monoclonal antibody neutralizesInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  20. Linking Virulence and Iron Limitation Response inJournal of proteome research · 2025
    Article

185 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia HerbertMicrobial Genetics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anne-Kathrin Ziebandt
Knut Ohlsen
Tina Schäfer
Michael Hecker
Dirk Albrecht
Richard Novick
Friedrich Götz
University of Tübingen · DEUniversität Greifswald · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DENew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus strains varies tremendously (as seen with animals). It is largely dependent on global regulators, which control the production of toxins, virulence, and fitness factors. Despite the vast knowledge of staphylococcal molecular genetics, there is still widespread dispute over what factors must come together to make a strain highly virulent. S. aureus NCTC8325 (RN1 and derivatives) is a widely used model strain for which an incomparable wealth of knowledge has accumulated in the almost 50 years since its isolation. Although RN1 has functional agr, sarA, and sae global regulators, it is defective in two regulatory genes, rsbU (a positive activator of SigB) and tcaR (an activator of protein A transcription), and is therefore considered by many to be a poor model for studies of regulation and virulence. Here, we repaired these genes and compared the resulting RN1 derivatives with other widely used strains, Newman, USA300, UAMS-1, and COL, plus the parental RN1, with respect to growth, extracellular protein pattern, hemolytic activity, protein A production, pigmentation, biofilm formation, and mouse lethality. The tcaR-repaired strain, showed little alteration in these properties. However, the rsbU-repaired strain was profoundly altered. Hemolytic activity was largely decreased, the exoprotein pattern became much more similar to that of typical wild-type (wt) S. aureus, and there was a surprising increase in mouse lethality. We note that each of the strains tested has a mutational alteration in one or more other regulatory functions, and we conclude that the repaired RN1 is a good model strain for studies of staphylococcal regulation and pathobiology; although strain Newman has been used extensively for such studies in recent years, it has a missense mutation in saeS, the histidine kinase component of the sae signaling module, which profoundly alters its regulatory phenotype. If this mutation were repaired, Newman would be considerably improved as a model strain.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAnimalsBacterial ProteinsFemaleHemolysisHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSurvival AnalysisVirulence FactorsBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID20212089
PMCPMC2876537
OpenAlexW2135673226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.