Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20209121›Full record

ArticleJALA (Charlottesville, Va.)2010

Automated high-throughput microchannel assays for cell biology: Operational optimization and characterization.

John P Puccinelli, Xiaojing Su, David J Beebe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JALA (Charlottesville, Va.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A Platform for High-Throughput Assessments of Environmental Multistressors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterizing asthma from a drop of blood using neutrophil chemotaxis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John P PuccinelliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53726.
Xiaojing Su
David J Beebe
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWisconsin Institutes for Discovery · US

Funding

Microchannel cell-based assays to enable cancer researchR33CA137673 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2009 to 2011
$1.4M
Study of Progenitor Regulation in Mouse Mammary GlandK25CA104162 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2004 to 2008
$751k
Microfluidic Channels for High Density, High Performance Culture AssaysR21CA122672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J · 2007 to 2008
$344k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA104162NCI NIH HHS R21 CA122672NCI NIH HHS R33 CA137673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening biological readouts in cell culture are increasing in frequency and throughput. In such assays, cell types may be rare and reagents or compounds may be expensive often resulting in a reduced number of conditions and/or replicates. "Tubeless" microfluidics offers a method to reduce this burden, as has been previously shown.1 In addition the In Cell Western (ICW) has recently been adapted to microfluidic cultures allowing high throughput analysis of immunocytochemistry (ICC) in microfluidic channels.2 Combining automated liquid handling in tubeless microfluidics with the ICW provides rapid and quantitative high throughput cell-based screens. Here we validate this platform using three parameters: operational robustness (pipetting reliability), cell seeding consistency, and cell staining consistency (both nuclear and antibody). Integration of liquid handling with microfluidics was found to be over 97% operationally robust. Cell seeding consistency between each microchannel and within each microchannel was found to be within a standard deviation of less than 5% and 6% respectively. Finally, through optimization of liquid handling steps, uniformity between all the channels was found for both nuclear and antibody staining. These results lay the foundation to perform most standard ICW assays using automated tubeless microfluidics.

Identifiers

PMID20209121
PMCPMC2830798
OpenAlexW2137485439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.