ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2009
Evaluation of a partnership approach to translating research on breast cancer and the environment.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing criteria for research translation decision-making in community settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis informed by the Knowledge to Action Framework and community input.Implementation science communications · 2022Review
- Participatory Research for Environmental Justice: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.Environmental health perspectives · 2021Review
- Development and Evaluation of a Training Program for Community-Based Participatory Research in Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2016Article
- "Exploring knowledge-user experiences in integrated knowledge translation: a biomedical investigation of the causes and consequences of food allergy".Research involvement and engagement · 2016Article
- Successful strategies to engage research partners for translating evidence into action in community health: a critical review.Journal of environmental and public health · 2015Review
- Knowledge translation in Iranian universities: need for serious interventions.Health research policy and systems · 2013Article
- Operationalization of community-based participatory research principles: assessment of the national cancer institute's community network programs.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Breast cancer environment centers and advocacy.Environmental health perspectives · 2011Article
- Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2011Article
- A review of advocate-scientist collaboration in federally funded environmental breast cancer research centers.Environmental health perspectives · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe growing literature on community-based participatory research (CBPR) suggests that a participatory approach benefits science in important ways. However there have been few formal evaluations of a CBPR approach itself, and few standards developed to assist in such efforts.
objectivesThis evaluation used CBPR guidelines developed by Green and colleagues to evaluate the participatory approach of the Community Outreach and Translation Core (COTC) of the Bay Area Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Center (BABCERC) in translating scientific findings from two key projects to the public.
methodTo assess key stakeholders' perceptions of alignment between the projects and the guidelines, four COTC members, four researchers, and four community members rated the projects on each of the 26 guidelines. These data were triangulated with transcripts from interviews with the same participants and a focus group with a subset of the participants.
resultsThe participatory approach by the COTC resulted in many important benefits including improved relationships among diverse stakeholders, knowledge generation, increased sensitivity and propriety of the research, and increased community support of research. However, several atypical features of this collaboration-for example, the basic and etiological nature of the science being undertaken, and the multiple communities (lay and activist/advocate) involved-resulted in different levels and qualities of participation among stakeholders.
conclusionsFurther research should focus on the adaptation of participatory research principles for different kinds of community partners and on the development and refinement of standards and tools to assist in evaluating the process and outcome of participatory research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.