Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20206667›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2010

Treatment of canine visceral leishmaniasis by the vaccine Leish-111f+MPL-SE.

Joelma Trigo, Melissa Abbehusen, Eduardo M Netto, Maria Nakatani, Geraldo Pedral-Sampaio, Robson Silva de Jesus, Yasuyuki Goto, Jeffrey Guderian, Randall F Howard, Steven G Reed

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. LmCenNPJ vaccines · 2025
    Article
  5. An update on recombinant vaccines against leishmaniasis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. A Chimera of Th1 Stimulatory Proteins ofBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joelma TrigoCanil Avançado em Monte Gordo de Pesquisa em Leishmanioses, Camaçari, Bahia-Clinvet, Brazil.
Melissa Abbehusen
Eduardo M Netto
Maria Nakatani
Geraldo Pedral-Sampaio
Robson Silva de Jesus
Yasuyuki Goto
Jeffrey Guderian
Randall F Howard
Steven G Reed
Infectious Disease Research Institute · USComplexo Hospitalar Universitário Professor Edgard Santos · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

LEISHMANIA ANTIGENS DEFINES BY IMMUNE RESPONSESR01AI025038 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REED, STEVEN GREGORY · 1987 to 2016
$5.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI25038NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI025038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) may provide an alternative to both marginally effective chemotherapy and undesired euthanasia of infected dogs and could have a great impact not only on animal welfare, but also on control of human disease. Therefore, we examined the potential immunotherapeutic efficacy of the subunit vaccine Leish-111f+MPL-SE, which has undergone rigorous preclinical testing and been demonstrated safe in human clinical trials. Two separate trials were performed in Salvador, Brazil, to evaluate the vaccine for therapeutic efficacy against CVL caused by natural infection: an Open Trial and a Blinded Trial. In the Open Trial 59 dogs with clinically active CVL were sequentially allocated to four groups: group 1 received Leish-111f+MPL-SE; group 2 was treated with Glucantime; group 3 received a combination of the vaccine and Glucantime; and group 4 was given no treatment. At the 6-month assessment, the 13 non-treated dogs had either died or showed no clinical improvement. In contrast, most dogs in groups 1-3 showed initial improvement (100%, 80%, and 92%, respectively). Upon evaluation for a mean of 36 months after therapy, the following cure rates were observed: 75% for group 1 dogs (exact 95% confidence interval [CI] 43-95%), 64% for group 2 dogs (exact 95% CI 31-89%), and 50% for group 3 dogs (exact 95% CI 19-81%). Therapeutic efficacy of the Leish-111f+MPL-SE vaccine was reconfirmed in a subsequent Blinded Trial. The vaccine was effective for mild cases of CVL and was compromised in dogs with severe disease. Although further studies are required to understand mechanisms of action, the Leish-111f+MPL-SE vaccine is a promising tool to control VL in both dogs and humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsBrazilDogsImmunotherapyLeishmaniasis VaccinesLeishmaniasis, VisceralMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniateOrganometallic CompoundsTreatment OutcomeAntiprotozoal AgentsLeishmaniasis VaccinesMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniateOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID20206667
PMCPMC2874835
OpenAlexW2085285405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.