Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20206583›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2010

Polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene MGMT and risk and progression of head and neck cancer.

Zhengdong Zhang, Luo Wang, Sheng Wei, Zhensheng Liu, Li-E Wang, Erich M Sturgis, Qingyi Wei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The potential role ofBioscience reports · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. The polymorphisms in the MGMT gene and the risk of cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Impacts of Biological Exposures.Journal of developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhengdong ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Luo Wang
Sheng Wei
Zhensheng Liu
Li-E Wang
Erich M Sturgis
Qingyi Wei
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Molecular Epidemiology of Head and Neck CancerR01ES011740 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WEI, QINGYI · 2001 to 2012
$6.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES011740NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylating agents are involved in carcinogenesis, and the DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) removes methyl group from O(6)-methylguanine. Genetic variation in DNA repair genes has been shown to contribute to susceptibility to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We hypothesize that MGMT polymorphisms are associated with risk of SCCHN. In a hospital-based case-control study of 721 patients with SCCHN and 1234 cancer-free controls frequency-matched by age, sex and ethnicity, we genotyped four MGMT polymorphisms, two in exon 3, 16195C>T and 16286C>T and two in the promoter region, 45996G>T and 46346C>A. We found that none of these polymorphisms alone had a significant effect on risk of SCCHN. However, when these four polymorphisms were evaluated together by the number of putative risk genotypes (i.e. 16195CC, 16286CC, 45996GT+TT, and 46346CA+AA), a statistically significantly increased risk of SCCHN was associated with the combined genotypes with three to four risk genotypes, compared with those with zero to two risk genotypes (adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.05-1.53). This increased risk was also more pronounced among young subjects (OR=1.81; 95% CI=1.11-2.96), men (OR=1.24; 95% CI=1.00-1.55), ever smokers (OR=1.25; 95%=1.01-1.56), ever drinkers (OR=1.29; 95% CI=1.04-1.60), patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OR=1.45; 95% CI=1.12-1.87), and oropharyngeal cancer with regional lymph node metastasis (OR=1.52; 95% CI=1.16-1.89). In conclusion, our results suggest that any one of MGMT variants may not have a substantial effect on SCCHN risk, but a joint effect of several MGMT variants may contribute to risk and progression of SCCHN, particularly for oropharyngeal cancer, in non-Hispanic whites.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBase SequenceCase-Control StudiesDNA Modification MethylasesDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGenotypeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20206583
PMCPMC2883263
OpenAlexW2009100605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.