Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20205682›Full record

ReviewCurrent molecular medicine2010

Perspectives on tissue interactions in development and disease.

D W Strand, O E Franco, D Basanta, A R A Anderson, S W Hayward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current molecular medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Architects of Pituitary Tumour Growth.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Homeostasis Back and Forth: An Ecoevolutionary Perspective of Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The pivotal role of integrin β1 in metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Isolation and analysis of discreet human prostate cellular populations.Differentiation; research in biological diversity
    Review
  20. Hybrid models of tumor growth.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D W StrandVanderbilt Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, AA-1309 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. douglas.w.strand@Vanderbilt.edu
O E Franco
D Basanta
A R A Anderson
S W Hayward
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

TrainingU54CA113007 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ESTRADA-RODGERS, LOURDES · 2004 to 2014
$19.2M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY BASIC RESEARCH TRAINING IN CANCERT32CA009592 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Justin M Balko, Julie A Rhoades (Sterling) · 1987 to 2026
$10.4M
Protein Collection and Proteomics Integrative Shared ResourceU54CA126505 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MATRISIAN, LYNN M · 2006 to 2010
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS 2T32 CA009592-21A1NCI NIH HHS CA113007NCI NIH HHS CA126505NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009592NCI NIH HHS U54 CA113007NCI NIH HHS U54 CA126505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the morphogenetic movements of the three germ layers during development to the reactive stromal microenvironment in cancer, tissue interactions are vital to maintaining healthy organ morphologic architecture and function. The stromal compartment is thought to be complicit in tumor progression and, as such, represents an opportune target for disease therapies. However, recent developments in our understanding of the diversity of the stromal compartment and the lack of appropriate models to study its relevance in human disease have limited our further understanding of the role of tissue interactions in tumor progression. The failure any model to fully recapitulate the complexities of systemic biology continue to create a higher imperative for incorporating various perspectives into a broader understanding for the ultimate goal of designing interventional therapies. Understanding this potential, this review examines the biological models used to study stromal-epithelial interactions and includes an attempt to incorporate behavioral terminology to define and mathematically model ecological relationships in stromal-epithelial interactions. In addition, the current attempt to incorporate these diverse ecological perspectives into in silico mathematical models through cross-disciplinary coordination is reviewed, which will provide a fresh perspective on defining cell group behavior and tissue ecology in disease and hopefully lead to the generation of new hypotheses to be empirically validated.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansNeoplasmsStromal Cells

Identifiers

PMID20205682
PMCPMC4195241
OpenAlexW2109711468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.