Trial reportClinical rheumatology2010
Retrospective clinical study of the efficacy of lower-dose methotrexate and infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy Across Methotrexate Regimens: A Pre-Specified Analysis of Two Phase III Trials.Arthritis care & research · 2016Trial
- Clinical outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis switched to tocilizumab after etanercept or infliximab failure.Clinical rheumatology · 2013Article
- Repeat etanercept administration restores clinical response of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of infliximab therapy with lower-dose methotrexate (MTX; < or = 4 mg per week) and with standard-dose MTX (> or = 6 mg per week) in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. One hundred thirty-eight patients with refractory RA were treated with intravenous infliximab; 106 patients underwent lower-dose MTX therapy, and 32 patients underwent standard-dose MTX therapy. Treatment responses at 54 weeks or last observation carried forward (LOCF) assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria were compared between the two groups. Eighty-eight patients (81.1%) in the lower-dose MTX group and 27 patients (84.3%) in the standard-dose MTX therapy completed 54 weeks of infliximab treatment. A EULAR response criteria good and moderate response was seen in 70.9% in the lower-dose group and 74.1% in the standard-dose group. Good and moderate treatment responses at 54 weeks or LOCF were seen in 66.0% in the lower-dose group and 68.7% in the standard-dose group. The outcome in the lower-dose MTX group was not significantly different from that in the standard-dose group. Therapy with MTX and infliximab was effective in Japanese RA patients, regardless of MTX dosage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20204668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.