Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20204564›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2010

An open-source framework of neural networks for diagnosis of coronary artery disease from myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Levent A Guner, Nese Ilgin Karabacak, Ozgur U Akdemir, Pinar Senkul Karagoz, Sinan A Kocaman, Atiye Cengel, Mustafa Unlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Content-based image retrieval for the diagnosis of myocardial perfusion imaging using a deep convolutional autoencoder.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Image-Based Cardiac Diagnosis With Machine Learning: A Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Machine learning for nuclear cardiology: The way forward.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Computerized decision making in myocardial perfusion SPECT: The new era in nuclear cardiology?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
  17. Computer-aided diagnosis system outperforms scoring analysis in myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Levent A GunerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Gazi University School of Medicine, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey. leventguner@yahoo.com
Nese Ilgin Karabacak
Ozgur U Akdemir
Pinar Senkul Karagoz
Sinan A Kocaman
Atiye Cengel
Mustafa Unlu
Gazi University · TRMiddle East Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to develop and analyze an open-source artificial intelligence program built on artificial neural networks that can participate in and support the decision making of nuclear medicine physicians in detecting coronary artery disease from myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS). METHODS AND

resultsTwo hundred and forty-three patients, who had MPS and coronary angiography within three months, were selected to train neural networks. Six nuclear medicine residents, one experienced nuclear medicine physician, and neural networks evaluated images of 65 patients for presence of coronary artery stenosis. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics analysis for networks and expert was .74 and .84, respectively. The AUC of the other physicians ranged from .67 to .80. There were no significant differences between expert, neural networks, and standard quantitative values, summed stress score and total stress defect extent.

conclusionsThe open-source neural networks developed in this study may provide a framework for further testing, development, and integration of artificial intelligence into nuclear cardiology environment.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonArtificial IntelligenceCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseExercise TestFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRadiopharmaceuticalsSensitivity and SpecificityTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiThallium RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiThallium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID20204564
OpenAlexW1985108699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.