Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20204417›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2010

Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis: the time has come.

Dana A Telem, Anthony J Vine, Garry Swain, Celia M Divino, Barry Salky, Adrian J Greenstein, Michael Harris, L Brian Katz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022
    Review
  5. Robotic Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Laparoscopy for Benign Diseases of the Colon.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surgical management of IBD--from an open to a laparoscopic approach.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Surgical management of ulcerative colitis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2012
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana A TelemDepartment of Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1010 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10128, USA.
Anthony J Vine
Garry Swain
Celia M Divino
Barry Salky
Adrian J Greenstein
Michael Harris
L Brian Katz
Mount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate laparoscopic versus open subtotal colectomy (STC) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring urgent or emergent operative intervention.

methodsA retrospective review was performed of 90 patients with medically refractory UC who underwent STC with end ileostomy at The Mount Sinai Medical Center from 2002 to 2007. Patients with toxic megacolon were excluded. Univariate analysis was conducted by unpaired Student t-test and chi-square test. Results are presented as mean +/- 95% confidence interval.

resultsNinety patients underwent STC, 29 by laparoscopic and 61 by open approach. In patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open STC, intraoperative blood loss was decreased (130.4 +/- 38.4 vs. 201.4 +/- 43.2 ml, p < 0.05) and operative time prolonged (216.4 +/- 20.2 vs. 169.9 +/- 14.4 min, p < 0.01). In the absence of postoperative complication, hospital length of stay (4.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 6 +/- 1.3 days, p < 0.001) was shorter in laparoscopic versus open group. No mortalities occurred. Overall morbidity, 30-day readmission, and reoperation were equivalent regardless of operative approach. Wound complications were absent in the laparoscopic group compared with 21.4% in the open group (p < 0.01). Follow-up at a mean of 36 months demonstrated no difference in restoration of gastrointestinal continuity.

conclusionLaparoscopic STC confers the benefits of improved cosmesis, reduced intraoperative blood loss, negligible wound complications, and shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopy is a feasible and safe alternative to open STC in patients with UC refractory to medical therapy requiring urgent or emergent operation.

Indexed as

AdultColectomyColitis, UlcerativeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIleostomyLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20204417
OpenAlexW1974935848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.