Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20204337›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2010

Use of non-specific intravenous human immunoglobulins in Spanish hospitals; need for a hospital protocol.

Belen Ruiz-Antorán, Antònia Agustí Escasany, Antoni Vallano Ferraz, Imma Danés Carreras, Neus Riba, Silvia Mateu Escudero, Joan Costa, M Blanca Sánchez Santiago, Leonor Laredo, José Antonio Durán Quintana and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical applications of immunoglobulin: update.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Belen Ruiz-AntoránClinical Pharmacology Department, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C/ Manuel de Falla 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. bruiz.hpth@salud.madrid.org
Antònia Agustí Escasany
Antoni Vallano Ferraz
Imma Danés Carreras
Neus Riba
Silvia Mateu Escudero
Joan Costa
M Blanca Sánchez Santiago
Leonor Laredo
José Antonio Durán Quintana
Juan Ramón Castillo
Francisco Abad-Santos
Concepción Payares Herrera
Belén Sádaba Díaz de Rada
Eugenio Gómez Ontañón
Hebron University · PSBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital Universitario Puerto Real · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESPuigvert Foundation · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIntravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) use in non-approved indications, the increase in consumption and its high cost recommend rationalisation in its utilisation.

aimsTo assess the use of IVIG in Spanish hospitals.

methodsAn observational, prospective and multicentre drug utilisation study was conducted in 13 tertiary Spanish hospitals. Data were collected for 3 months in patients receiving any IVIG. Patient demographics, indication for IVIG use, dosage regimen and cost of treatment were collected.

resultsFive hundred and fifty-four patients (mean age of 52 years) were included in the study. A total of 1,287 prescriptions were administered, and the average number of prescriptions per patient was 2.3. The mean daily dose was 24 g (range 0.6-90 g). Overall, IVIG was prescribed for authorised indications in 335 patients (60%) with 953 prescriptions (74%), for non-authorised indications with scientific evidentiary support in 86 patients (16%) with 137 prescriptions (11%), and non-authorised and non-accepted indications in 133 patients (24%) with 197 prescriptions (15%). The most frequent authorised indications were primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, and the most frequent non-authorised and non-accepted indications were multiple sclerosis and bullous dermatosis. The mean cost of IVIG per patient for authorised indications was 2,636.2 <euro>, non-authorised indications with scientific support 5,262.1 <euro> and non-accepted indications 3,555.8 <euro>.

conclusionsIVIG is prescribed for a significant number of non-authorised and non-accepted indications with a notable cost. There is an important variability in IVIG prescriptions between hospitals, indicating room for improvement in IVIG use and the need for a consensus of protocol use.

Indexed as

Drug CostsAdultAgedDrug UtilizationEmpathyFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedOff-Label UseProspective StudiesSpainImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID20204337
OpenAlexW2023976348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.