ArticleJournal of computational and theoretical nanoscience2008
Nanoscale Nonlinear dynamic characterization of the neuron-electrode junction.
Article in Journal of computational and theoretical nanoscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of system identification techniques for nonlinear modeling of the neuron-microelectrode junction.Journal of computational and theoretical nanoscience · 2013Article
- Influence of the solvent on the stability of bis(terpyridine) structures on graphite.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2013Article
- An optimization-based study of equivalent circuit models for representing recordings at the neuron-electrode interface.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular recordings from neurons using microelectrode and field effect transistor arrays suffer from many problems including low signal to noise ratio, signal attenuation due to counter-ion diffusion from the bulk extracellular medium and a modification of the shape of the cell-generated potentials due to the presence of a highly dispersive dielectric medium in the cell-electrode cleft. Attempts to date to study the neuron-electrode interface have focused on point or area contact linear-equivalent-circuit models. We present here the results obtained from a 'data-true' nonlinear dynamic characterization of the neuron-electrode junction using Volterra-Wiener modeling. For the characterization, NG108-15 cells were cultured on microelectrode arrays and stimulated with broadband Gaussian white noise under voltage clamp mode. A Volterra-Wiener model was then estimated using the input signal and the extracellular signal recorded on the microelectrode. The existence of the second order Wiener kernel confirmed that the recorded extracellular signal had a nonlinear component. The verification of the estimated model was carried out by employing the intracellular action potential as an input to the Volterra-Wiener model and comparing the predicted extracellular response with the corresponding extracellular signal recorded on the microelectrode. We believe that a 'data-true' Volterra-Wiener model of the neuron-electrode junction shall not only facilitate a direct insight into the physicochemical processes taking place at the interface during signal transduction but will also allow one to evolve strategies for engineering the neuron-electrode interface using surface chemical modification of the microelectrodes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.