Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20204074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2010

"It's Not What You Say, But How You Say it": A Reciprocal Temporo-frontal Network for Affective Prosody.

David I Leitman, Daniel H Wolf, J Daniel Ragland, Petri Laukka, James Loughead, Jeffrey N Valdez, Daniel C Javitt, Bruce I Turetsky, Ruben C Gur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. No laughing matter: intranasal oxytocin administration changes functional brain connectivity during exposure to infant laughter.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2012
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Olfactory learning and memory in the greater short-nosed fruit bat Cynopterus sphinx: the influence of conspecifics distress calls.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David I LeitmanDepartment of Psychiatry-Neuropsychiatry Program, Brain Behavior Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel H Wolf
J Daniel Ragland
Petri Laukka
James Loughead
Jeffrey N Valdez
Daniel C Javitt
Bruce I Turetsky
Ruben C Gur

Funding

The Neurobiology of Affective Dysfunction in SchizophreniaR01MH060722 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RUBEN C. · 2001 to 2010
$4.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans communicate emotion vocally by modulating acoustic cues such as pitch, intensity and voice quality. Research has documented how the relative presence or absence of such cues alters the likelihood of perceiving an emotion, but the neural underpinnings of acoustic cue-dependent emotion perception remain obscure. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 20 subjects we examined a reciprocal circuit consisting of superior temporal cortex, amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus that may underlie affective prosodic comprehension. Results showed that increased saliency of emotion-specific acoustic cues was associated with increased activation in superior temporal cortex [planum temporale (PT), posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), and posterior superior middle gyrus (pMTG)] and amygdala, whereas decreased saliency of acoustic cues was associated with increased inferior frontal activity and temporo-frontal connectivity. These results suggest that sensory-integrative processing is facilitated when the acoustic signal is rich in affective information, yielding increased activation in temporal cortex and amygdala. Conversely, when the acoustic signal is ambiguous, greater evaluative processes are recruited, increasing activation in inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and IFG STG connectivity. Auditory regions may thus integrate acoustic information with amygdala input to form emotion-specific representations, which are evaluated within inferior frontal regions.

Indexed as

amygdalaauditory cortexemotioninferior frontal gyrusprosodyspeech

Identifiers

PMID20204074
PMCPMC2831710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.